Schoolgirls wearing short skirts...

Joined
12 Feb 2014
Messages
1,347
Reaction score
428
Country
United Kingdom
Not sure of all the details, but was listening to the news as I drove home and some female head of school has decided that starting next term all girls at her school must wear trousers.

Apparently, male teachers get over excited with schoolgirls wearing short skirts.

The question is, if male teachers are getting excited by young girls in short skirts, should they be allowed anywhere near a school?
 
Sponsored Links
I'd say it depends on how young the girls are.
There are some 15-16-year old girls who look really quite adult and, regardless of the legalities, I can understand some male teachers feeling 'over-excited' even though they will make every effort to control their feelings.
 
Sponsored Links
Did the news actually say "get over-excited"?

As I said, not sure of the details, but if they are even distracted by their pupils wearing skirts short or otherwise, should they be teaching?
 
In the mid 1960s schoolgirls and older girls in short skirts got me very excited :love: but then I was only 15/16 myself. By the time I left university and saw mother and school age daughter walking down the street, I fancied the mother. ;)
 
Just remember, some of these male teachers could be as young as 22/23 themselves. The schoolgirls could be as old as 18 (if they've stopped on for 6th form) Human nature laddie. Tell me a red blooded male who wouldn't find his heart rate increased by the sight of a shapely pair o legs. ;);)
 
Do fecking teenagers actually go to school these days? Seems to be they spend more than half of their time on one break/half-term or another and, even when they do go, what are they learning? (Note I am not referring to what they are taught) Feck all as far as I can see. Most cannot add nor speak or spell properly. They appear to rely solely on their mobiles for everything and human interaction is via text or some social networking bollo**s like What's Oop or Faceache. Those feckers probably envy Stephen Hawking's set-up!

Ermm...rant over

:oops:
 
The son of a friend of mine wants to move to a all boys school because of the disruptive behaviour of a few girls in short skirts. They flirt with teachers and pupils and as a result those who want to learn cannot get a full lesson of un-interupted education
.
Don't get him wrong. He has a very attractive long term girl friend, attractive as a person no matter what clothes she is wearing. Unlike the bimbos in short skirts who are also short on real personality.
 
Unless you intend to chemically castrate all teachers (remember, there are plenty of female teacher's that have done the dirty with students), then you are talking crap.

It is natural to be attracted to pretty young pubescent/post pubescent people, of whatever sex you prefer, acting on it is another matter.
 
Do fecking teenagers actually go to school these days? Seems to be they spend more than half of their time on one break/half-term or another and, even when they do go, what are they learning? (Note I am not referring to what they are taught) Feck all as far as I can see. Most cannot add nor speak or spell properly. They appear to rely solely on their mobiles for everything and human interaction is via text or some social networking bollo**s like What's Oop or Faceache. Those feckers probably envy Stephen Hawking's set-up!

Ermm...rant over

:oops:
There is no doubt in my mind that educational standards in this country are falling. There are a number of reasons, not least of which is government interference: league tables, constantly 'improving' the curriculum, etc. Another is society itself: the number of families who choose the 'benefits option' and, consequently, have no interest in, nor need of education.

Yet another problem is disruption in the classroom. Teachers have little real control of pupils these days, thanks to the do-gooders and their banning of the cane, and the pupils know it.

There will always be some children and young people who DO want to learn (thanks mainly to being brought up properly), and their chances in life are often being ruined by those children and young people who DO NOT want to learn. Unfortunately, successive governments and their appointed 'experts' are in favour of inclusivity, where the good are forced to mix with the bad.

I've said it before, but here goes. If I were the emperor of the world, I'd make education optional. Yes, you heard me correctly. Only those who want an education would go to school. Unhindered, they would learn and develop to the best of their ability (I realise that not everyone is going to be a brain surgeon or a rocket scientist) and have a real chance in life.
Those who don't want an education could do what they want and suffer the consequences when adults.
Of course, there are a couple of conditions under which this hypothetical system would work: no benefits unless physically or mentally unable to work (must accept any job offered); immediate imprisonment for anti-social behaviour, crimes and other misdemeanours.

(Incidentally, this forum seems not to recognise the correct spelling of 'inclusivity' and 'misdemeanours'! :confused:)
 
Agree with all you say JBR.

Contrary to what the 'new-age educationalists' say, streaming was (and still is) a great system.
 
Something wrong with this ****ing country I've seen infant school children wearing hi vis
 
Something wrong with this ****ing country I've seen infant school children wearing hi vis

Are you sure they weren't police officers? They've scrapped the height requirement and they're starting to look younger...
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top