- Joined
- 13 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 4,009
- Reaction score
- 661
- Country
Nah.. Wiggins is that geezer who rides the motorpike and sidecarp.
Last edited:
Rossi E-Cat cold fusion to solve world energy problems
- Thread starter WarmSoks
- Start date
Sponsored Links
I thought it was a lattice work of fried potatoes.
You are probably right. They say fusion is 40 years away, and the joke is that they have said that for the last 50 years. Current fusion test reactors are huge and cost a fortune, due to the incredibly high temperatures and pressures required to achieve ignition. It is conceivable that some bright spark (excuse the pun) will think up some more modest way to achieve fusion, but the maths and physics are very complex. There are not many if any loners who invent scientifically important technologies. It is usually if not always government funded bodies and huge industrial concerns. If you look at research papers on fusion, you sometimes see tens if not hundreds of authors.
Sponsored Links
It was a scam when this thread was started, and its still a scam.
He makes promises that its just a few years away.
No hard evidence, no peer review.
If it was real he'd have made millions by now, but he's still doing the same con.
However, if you want to believe it, why don't you put your own money into it?
He makes promises that its just a few years away.
No hard evidence, no peer review.
If it was real he'd have made millions by now, but he's still doing the same con.
However, if you want to believe it, why don't you put your own money into it?
In Nov 2011 you claimed:
Its now 2015, and we are still waiting for a single verified model. But we have no shortage of failed promises from a scam artist. And you still don't think its a scam?
Its now 2015, and we are still waiting for a single verified model. But we have no shortage of failed promises from a scam artist. And you still don't think its a scam?
Where is your evidence for your continual assertion of it being a scam ?
There have been third party tests , patent application by large companies such as Airbus.
Verification that it is real by NASA scientists.
but still you harp on about a flawed / known to be corrupt peer review process.
Are you really saying that for you to accept it, you are waiting for a high priest of Scientism to give you permission.
What will you be saying in five months if it is shown to be operational ? That's what I would like to know !!
See earlier in the thread, or just google "Rossi scam"
Which have also been shown to be flawed. There have been evidence to show that its a scam.
Meaning nothing. A patent does not mean they take it seriously. It certainly does not mean it works. There are many patents in this world for non-existent technology.
No. There was a claim that this was the case, but NASA does not claim that the E-Cat works.
Evidence is needed. As in true scientific evidence, and not a demo by a scam artist. You or anyone else has yet to provide any.
I have already posted evidence that its a scam earlier in the thread. You still claim it isn't, but have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim beyond Rossi related links, which given he is a serial scam artist hardly speaks of scientific cred. There needs to be some kind of peer review, evidence that stands up to scrutiny.
You are making extraordinary claims, so you must provide the extraordinary evidence.
Its a bit like claims about supernatural powers:
You see, socks, the way evidence works, is that if you make an assertion, you have to provide evidence to support it.
The rest of the world is not required to produce evidence to prove you wrong.
Nobody is obliged to believe you if you make the unsupported claim that the moon is made of spam, or the world was created by a pink unicorn.
"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
Sponsored Links
