Consumer Unit

I agree the RCBO is also a overload, however it seems some are unaware it is a RCD.
And why did the more descriptive term of RCCB became the somewhat-vague RCD while RCBO is still being used? Why hasn't that become an RCDO?

I really don't understand the messing around with terminology for the sake of it which seems to have started to pervade the U.K. electrical trade in more recent years.

Although it's not how we've come to use it, wasn't the intention that 'RCD' should be a generic term which covered a range of devices, and that the specific devices we now usually call RCDs should really have continued to be called ELCBs or RCCBs?
I've lost track, but perhaps that was the original intent. Which leads us to wonder why RCCB was abandoned in favor of the generic RCD by most manufacturers after such a relatively short time.

As for the difference between the latter two, I suppose that if one is prepared to consider the incredibly unlikely, the 'residual current' does not have to be due to 'earth leakage' (or, in the US, a 'ground fault') - so, in that sense, RCCB is probably technically more correct.
Certainly - Putting a current-operated ELCB / RCCB / RCD / GFCI on an existing circuit is a sure-fire way to find any "borrowed" neutrals where there is no earth/ground fault current involved, but that's probably about the only time it's likely, although an obscure fault between two circuits could also do it.

At least the U.K. doesn't yet seem to be going anywhere near the AFCI; it's anybody's guess what it might end up being called there!
 
Sponsored Links
I think it probably is because RCCBs were around before RCBOs.

Therefore, in the beginning, (well, not that far back) to have RCD protection in the consumer unit or before it an RCCB was used but it could be called an RCD because it was one.
Now we have both RCCBs and RCBOs we have to distinguish.

It may be true that an RCBO should really be an RCCBO.

I do agree, though, that there seems to be next no thought used when determining names and abbreviations in the electrical trade; renaming Periodic Inspections EICRs, when EICs are already in place is but one example.

The classic, in my opinion, is that RFC stands for ring final circuit but not radial final circuit.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
I do think the "final" in the ring description is rather important as it is only with ring finals that the ring is maintained. With a ring with other installations there is a completely different idea in that any part of the ring can be taken out of service for work to be completed. The main ring around a factory is so different to the ring main used in a house hence why called ring final. However we can argue where fused connection units are used to supply a number of sockets on a spur the ring is not the final circuit. However it is a circuit supplying direct to appliances as well as to spur so it is a ring final, but not a ring final circuit!

I really think it should not matter what things are called. However since Part P names have become a lot more important. Before Part P did not matter if called fuse box, distribution unit, or consumer unit.

I always called a fused spur a radial, but then noted BS7671 now calls it a fused spur. I still think that is wrong, call a fused spur a radial and then there is no confusion where saying you can't spur off a spur.

But the lighting industry must be the worst for names.
Transformer or Electronic Transformer
Ballast or Electronic Ballast
Driver is really bad as we have both voltage and current regulated devices being called drivers, I had always considered voltage regulated was a power supply and current regulated was a driver, it seems that's no longer true.
Switched Mode Power supply - Pulse width modulated Are these not the same beast?
ELCB-c, RCCB, RCB, RCD, GFCI, GFI, ALCI, Plus the extra A, AC, or B and G or S. As to what to call it when you have a MCB with an attachment which turns it into a RCBO I don't know? The attachment does not break the current flow the MCB does that.

Residual is what is left over or in maths the error so I suppose since it does not have to go to earth or ground dropping the ELCB or GFCI names makes sense. Where current is allowed to go to a storage device or to ground to remove spikes on the supply it is also clearly not a fault it is by design, also it's not leaking so any reference to fault, earth, ground, or leaking is incorrect. Also since some devices only detect the current and another device does the breaking of the current then for a one name fits all don't really want breaker in the name unless it has the breaker built in.

So we have three names left. RCD covers all, RCCB (Some do miss out the extra C so call it a RCB) is where the breaker is integral to the device and when an overload sensing is also added we add O so we have RCBO.
 
Plus the extra A, AC, or B and G or S.
Now you've lost me. A, AC, B, G, S?
The A is for sinusoidal AC supplies with inverters often it needs to be AC which means it can have a DC component, think but not sure B is for DC? The G means it trips straight away and S means delayed. There is also passive which stays connected with a power cut and active which auto trips with a power cut. It is down to the loop impedance if the loop impedance is high a short circuit could drop the voltage to a level where the electronics would not work but there is not enough current to trip the overload device.

There are also combined RCM and RCD where the leakage current is monitored so giving warning when a trip is likely. There are even auto resetting RCD's however these are no longer permitted with domestic property.
 
The A is for sinusoidal AC supplies with inverters often it needs to be AC which means it can have a DC component, think but not sure B is for DC? The G means it trips straight away and S means delayed.
Ah, thanks. I've lost track of all the changing designations and sub-designations in recent years. I wonder what term the U.K. will adopt if the AFCI ever makes it over there? Or maybe the U.K. will have the sense not to have anything to do with them.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top