No lamb, the good ones didn't instill fear, they engaged with the class, encouraged and motivated them. They didn't have or need fear in their tool box.
What a wonderful bubble you must have grown up in AJ.
No lamb, the good ones didn't instill fear, they engaged with the class, encouraged and motivated them. They didn't have or need fear in their tool box.
Whence did the first bad parents come?
No lamb, the good ones didn't instill fear, they engaged with the class, encouraged and motivated them. They didn't have or need fear in their tool box.
What a wonderful bubble you must have grown up in AJ.
The evidence suggests that a child at a bad school taught by a good teacher is better off than one with a bad teacher at a good school. The benefits of having been in the class of a good teacher cascade down the years; the same is true of the penalty for having had a bad teacher. Such effects do not fall evenly upon the population: the children who gain most from good teachers are those from disadvantaged homes in which parental time, money and books are in short supply. Being in the classroom of a great teacher is the best hope these children have of catching up with their more fortunate peers.
Sorry, I must have misread your comment.I didn't say it didn't make sense. I said it didn't make a difference.
Does that mean you always place comma after 'therefore'?
I was taken to task for missing this:
As long as the meaning is conveyed, they who can't spell espouse it does not matter.
Why? What did I do wrong in that sentence?
I could be wrong EFLI, but I think that you really meant:
'As long as the meaning is conveyed, the actual spelling doesn't really matter'.
If that was your intention, then the "they who can't spell espouse it does not matter" creates ambiguity or uncertainty for the reader.
Yes and no. Slipper or cane, provided such punishments are properly witnessed and recorded. The others you mention, no.Fair enough. Should we go back to the good old days when teachers were able to discipline a child with a slipper, the cane, maybe a punch, the chair, ball-pane hammer or anything else that came to hand?Discipline could be better enforced at schools
It depends on the 'good' families. Parents who bully their children, yet offer little love or encouragement, often result in bad children.So bad families = bad kids. There are many examples of children from good families going bad. Surely good families = good kids.but it is not where the rot begins
THEIR parents! That's why bad behaviour often, in fact almost always, runs in families.But bad kids are bad largely because of how their parents brought them up - that's nurture.
Exactly right, Who taught the parents???
Yes but my salient point was that this is only thought by those who can't spell.I could be wrong EFLI, but I think that you really meant:
'As long as the meaning is conveyed, the actual spelling doesn't really matter'.
The parents won't allow it and nor will their solicitors.Fair enough. Should we go back to the good old days when teachers were able to discipline a child with a slipper, the cane, maybe a punch, the chair, ball-pane hammer or anything else that came to hand.
I could be wrong EFLI, but I think that you really meant:
'As long as the meaning is conveyed, the actual spelling doesn't really matter'.
Yes,but my main point was,that this is only thought by those who can't spell.
This must, therefore, be included.
We are all bad. We are predisposed to eat, sleep and procreate. We have the badness educated out of us from birth.Where did the first bad parents come from?
I know, in this thread, I should not end the sentence with a preposition so:
Whence did the first bad parents come?
The parents won't allow it and nor will their solicitors.Fair enough. Should we go back to the good old days when teachers were able to discipline a child with a slipper, the cane, maybe a punch, the chair, ball-pane hammer or anything else that came to hand.
Some parents actually believe that their child is golden and that it must be everyone else in the school who is at fault. They are still blaming the school even after the child has been excluded, after many home visits, letters, recommendations etc. It is these blinkered parents who are at fault, not the teachers. Mums happy because Declan is in his room with his phone and any other devices she can occupy him with whilst she continues to get fat watching Jeremy Kyle and chomping on biscuits and smoking fags waiting for the tinnies to cool down she had to waddle across the road for, bought from one stop.
We are all bad. We are predisposed to eat, sleep and procreate. We have the badness educated out of us from birth.Where did the first bad parents come from?
I know, in this thread, I should not end the sentence with a preposition so:
Whence did the first bad parents come?
Teachers teach us our education. Behaviour is taught from birth.