Pollution v terrorism.

My guess is that modern communication methods simplifies global terrorism.

My guess is that it is a lot to do with one of these:

images
 
Sponsored Links
Terrorism in western society is a symptom of immigration, ie. immigrants unsuited to democracies based on largely Christian values
I think Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, the guy who shot up the church in the US and the animal rights nutcases may prove your point wrong.

Just because others are also guilty of terrorism, doesn't prove my point wrong. With Islamic terrorism, we're only at the beginning of a very long and dangerous road.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ve-foiled-34-terror-plots-in-UK-since-77.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...4432/Al-Qaeda-plotting-attack-on-Britain.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30734290

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/faebceca-9752-11e4-845a-00144feabdc0.html#slide0

Not a Daily Mail headline in sight.

I don't quite understand your point.

You are saying that terrorism is a symptom of immigration, yet there are countless examples of non immigrants taking part in terrorism the world over.

In fact in the 7/7 bombings, only 1 was born outside the UK, and he was born in Jamaica! Hardly a hot bed of terrorism.

Are you trying to say that those with dark skins and names like - Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain hail from good, British, Anglo Saxon stock? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Maybe your idea of immigrants is different to mine, but if it has a comedy beard and sticks it's butt in the air in the name of allah, then it's most definitely an immigrant. Ironically, Germain Lindsay, the Jamaican from this line up of diversity's finest, has the most British sounding name.

(Don't know why the text has gone bold)
 
Last edited:
Terrorism in western society is a symptom of immigration
So what you are saying is stop immigration and terrorism will cease?.

No, because to achieve anything close to total cessation, you would have to also undertake mass deportations. And I don't think you would have the stomach for it.

Unfortunately, those like yourself who see no wrong in virtually uncontrolled immigration of people we nothing about, have let in the enemy within.
 
Terrorism and pollution are one and the same. They waft over silently then kill you.
True , the main difference is one can be perpetrated by one's own country and the other by agents of another country or organisation .
 
Sponsored Links
Terrorism in western society is a symptom of immigration, ie. immigrants unsuited to democracies based on largely Christian values
I think Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, the guy who shot up the church in the US and the animal rights nutcases may prove your point wrong.

Just because others are also guilty of terrorism, doesn't prove my point wrong. With Islamic terrorism, we're only at the beginning of a very long and dangerous road.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ve-foiled-34-terror-plots-in-UK-since-77.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...4432/Al-Qaeda-plotting-attack-on-Britain.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30734290

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/faebceca-9752-11e4-845a-00144feabdc0.html#slide0

Not a Daily Mail headline in sight.

I don't quite understand your point.

You are saying that terrorism is a symptom of immigration, yet there are countless examples of non immigrants taking part in terrorism the world over.

In fact in the 7/7 bombings, only 1 was born outside the UK, and he was born in Jamaica! Hardly a hot bed of terrorism.

Are you trying to say that those with dark skins and names like - Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain hail from good, British, Anglo Saxon stock? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Maybe your idea of immigrants is different to mine, but if it has a comedy beard and sticks it's butt in the air in the name of allah, then it's most definitely an immigrant. Ironically, Germain Lindsay, the Jamaican from this line up of diversity's finest, has the most British sounding name.

(Don't know why the text has gone bold)
Ah ok, well if we can tell terrorists apart from their names, I reckon MI5 should be laughing :rolleyes:
 
Terrorism in western society is a symptom of immigration, ie. immigrants unsuited to democracies based on largely Christian values
I think Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, the guy who shot up the church in the US and the animal rights nutcases may prove your point wrong.

Just because others are also guilty of terrorism, doesn't prove my point wrong. With Islamic terrorism, we're only at the beginning of a very long and dangerous road.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ve-foiled-34-terror-plots-in-UK-since-77.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...4432/Al-Qaeda-plotting-attack-on-Britain.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30734290

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/faebceca-9752-11e4-845a-00144feabdc0.html#slide0

Not a Daily Mail headline in sight.

I don't quite understand your point.

You are saying that terrorism is a symptom of immigration, yet there are countless examples of non immigrants taking part in terrorism the world over.

In fact in the 7/7 bombings, only 1 was born outside the UK, and he was born in Jamaica! Hardly a hot bed of terrorism.

Are you trying to say that those with dark skins and names like - Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain hail from good, British, Anglo Saxon stock? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Maybe your idea of immigrants is different to mine, but if it has a comedy beard and sticks it's butt in the air in the name of allah, then it's most definitely an immigrant. Ironically, Germain Lindsay, the Jamaican from this line up of diversity's finest, has the most British sounding name.

(Don't know why the text has gone bold)
Ah ok, well if we can tell terrorists apart from their names, I reckon MI5 should be laughing :rolleyes:

It's a good place to start though isn't it.
 
Terrorism in western society is a symptom of immigration, ie. immigrants unsuited to democracies based on largely Christian values
I think Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, the guy who shot up the church in the US and the animal rights nutcases may prove your point wrong.

Just because others are also guilty of terrorism, doesn't prove my point wrong. With Islamic terrorism, we're only at the beginning of a very long and dangerous road.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ve-foiled-34-terror-plots-in-UK-since-77.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...4432/Al-Qaeda-plotting-attack-on-Britain.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30734290

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/faebceca-9752-11e4-845a-00144feabdc0.html#slide0

Not a Daily Mail headline in sight.

I don't quite understand your point.

You are saying that terrorism is a symptom of immigration, yet there are countless examples of non immigrants taking part in terrorism the world over.

In fact in the 7/7 bombings, only 1 was born outside the UK, and he was born in Jamaica! Hardly a hot bed of terrorism.

Are you trying to say that those with dark skins and names like - Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain hail from good, British, Anglo Saxon stock? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Maybe your idea of immigrants is different to mine, but if it has a comedy beard and sticks it's butt in the air in the name of allah, then it's most definitely an immigrant. Ironically, Germain Lindsay, the Jamaican from this line up of diversity's finest, has the most British sounding name.

(Don't know why the text has gone bold)
Ah ok, well if we can tell terrorists apart from their names, I reckon MI5 should be laughing :rolleyes:

It's called profiling, and all security services will use it. Not only do the 7/7 bombers have names that should mark them out as immigrants to all but the most blinkered, but their actions were those of people who had no affinity for the country in which they were living.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top