Query on timber sizing - and converting imperial to metric.

Joined
5 Aug 2011
Messages
126
Reaction score
3
Location
Dorset
Country
United Kingdom
Could someone please explain timber size conversions in a way that I can understand?

I am looking at possibly building a shed, a lot of people are recommending 3x2. When I go looking for 3x2 (which I presume is 3"x2") I find 63mm x 38mm - which is 2.5"x1.5".

Is this what is meant by 3x2, or should I be looking out for 75mm x 50mm?
 
Sponsored Links
Lot of timber yards will quote 47 x 75 or 47 x 100 as 3 x 2 or 4 x 2 (47 x 150 for 6 x 2)

Don't take the conversion size as a literal. Nearest approximate size in mm will be fine.

I don't know Dorset but, as an example, see below.

You will note the 47mm thickness and various widths


http://www.sydenhams.co.uk/treated-timber.aspx
 
Last edited:
Timber sizes refer to the original sawn size. When the timber is machined to produce 'smooth' finishes (PAR - planed all round or PSE - planed square edge for example) then the finished size is smaller than the original size.

If you go to a timber merchants then you are likely to have a wider selection of sizes and you may find imperial sizes as well as metric.
 
Timber sizes refer to the original sawn size. When the timber is machined to produce 'smooth' finishes (PAR - planed all round or PSE - planed square edge for example) then the finished size is smaller than the original size.

If you go to a timber merchants then you are likely to have a wider selection of sizes and you may find imperial sizes as well as metric.
And take a tape measure with you!

To me, 3 x 2 = 75 x 50. An inch is just about 25mm.
 
Sponsored Links
it is quirk that came in when metrication was introduced, ( a bit like asking for a pint of beer)
timber was always known as 3x2 or 4x2 (imperial measurements) and its seems to have stuck
So a builder now asks for a 3 metre length of 4x2 (n)
 
it is quirk that came in when metrication was introduced, ( a bit like asking for a pint of beer)
timber was always known as 3x2 or 4x2 (imperial measurements) and its seems to have stuck
So a builder now asks for a 3 metre length of 4x2 (n)
Which is kind of my point, if you ask for a size based on imperial measurements you could end up with the wrong size timber due to the different metric specifications.

I suppose that is negated a little with PAR, PSE, CLS, &c... however it is still bloody confusing.

In the building of a (very basic) garden shed where 3x2 is recommended, would you use 75x50(47) or 63x38?
 
Either is going to be stronger than that used in mass produced sheds so take your pick.
In that case, what about 47x47?

The 63x38 has a surface area of 23.94 cm² and the 47x47 had an area of 22.09 cm².

I'm just thinking the squarer profile would be easier to work with.
 
Depends on the size of the intended shed. For a small shed, 47 x 47 will be fine for carcassing.

I would definitely check pricing though because you would be surprised by the variations in prices out there.
 
ask for actual sizes you will then get the finished size
also remember wet wood can be swollen by up to 10% but not in length
 
Yep because he said 'as an example'.

However, having seen your post on this subject in another topic, don't use 47 x 47 for your LARGE shed. I suggest 4 x2 (100 x 47)
 
Yep because he said 'as an example'.

However, having seen your post on this subject in another topic, don't use 47 x 47 for your LARGE shed. I suggest 4 x2 (100 x 47)

Thank you for your advice on the matter. But isn't that going to be overkill?

The existing 8'x10' shed is built out of 38x38mm at 600mm centres, and having had a look at a local shed "specialists" (Stable Structures and Broomhill Garden Buildings), they are all using 47x47/47x50 and 38x63 at a push - even for their 16'x12' sheds.

Even an online shed builder I was looking at is only using 38x63.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top