Sponsored Links
R
RogueHanger
That's assuming that the immigrants since 1983 have beome naturalised British citizens because, by it's definition, the survey only included "Britons"
R
RogueHanger
These weren't your words then, Brigadier:
Maybe someone else's opinion, not yours?
R
RogueHanger
What a ridiculous comment, based on imagination and guesswork.
Why don't you make suggestions to those who conduct the survey, to suggest that it would be a good idea to breakdown the degree of prejudice according to ethnicity rather than making silly claims.
Sponsored Links
R
RogueHanger
Another dopey claim based on prejudice and guesswork.
The British Social Attitudes survey has been conducted since 1983. Prejudice is only a fraction of the attitudes that are monitored.
I think one can ssume a degree of competence on the part of the data collectors.
Yet all the arguments against the findings, on GD forum, so far, have been wild and audacious claims that some GD posters know better, and can therefore, confidently dismiss the findings.
The mind boggles.
R
RogueHanger
I'm not easily upset, but it pained me to watch all of that barbaric torturing.
What comes next when the 'religion of peace' completely takes over? Ritual stoning to death?
Well, if someone asks "am I predicated against other races", the answer is yes.
But that's only because the real question should be "am I prejudiced against other cultures", but no one asks that question, academics only ever see racism.
Many other cultures are inferior to ours, the PC brigade would see people hung for saying that, but it is true. Many people recognise this and mix this with race (which is only an identifier not a cause), this problem isnt helped by an academic community that is predominantly pro multicultural, and intermixes race and culture, they think if you hate a culture you hate the race.
But that's only because the real question should be "am I prejudiced against other cultures", but no one asks that question, academics only ever see racism.
Many other cultures are inferior to ours, the PC brigade would see people hung for saying that, but it is true. Many people recognise this and mix this with race (which is only an identifier not a cause), this problem isnt helped by an academic community that is predominantly pro multicultural, and intermixes race and culture, they think if you hate a culture you hate the race.
B
Big Tone
I don't give a sh.1t if only 0.01% of Halal is not stunned, it's as disgusting as the barbarians who perform the ritual.
At least in the civilized world we are making inroads to make the animals not suffer and get it right.
I will actively avoid anything Halal from now on. After seeing those poor sheep stacked up and desperately kicking and writhing made me sick to my stomach!
It would have been kinder, and quicker, to just behead them, but that wouldn't satisfy the sadists. And all in the perverted name of religion.
At least in the civilized world we are making inroads to make the animals not suffer and get it right.
I will actively avoid anything Halal from now on. After seeing those poor sheep stacked up and desperately kicking and writhing made me sick to my stomach!
It would have been kinder, and quicker, to just behead them, but that wouldn't satisfy the sadists. And all in the perverted name of religion.
I expect that 0.01% figure came from coathanger.
Wouldn't believe that.
"In February 2014, Minister for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Dan Jørgensen signed a regulation which banned ritual slaughter of animals without prior stunning.[18] Prior to this, religious groups could file for an exemption to the law that required stunning if they wanted to slaughter without prior stunning, although no groups had applied for such exemption. At the time, all halal slaughter in Denmark was performed with prior stunning, while kosher slaughter (which does not allow stunning) had not been practiced in Denmark since around 2004, all kosher meat being imported. In spite of this, the Muslim and Jewish Communities in Denmark strongly opposed the decree, arguing that it constituted an infringement upon religious freedom."
Seems we should follow Denmarks lead.
Its quite scary the power some of these minority groups can muster in order to lobby the government for a cause.
Though I guess with our lot they just cave in for fear of upsetting the *****************.
Yet bliar went to war killing tens of thousands of them!
Wouldn't believe that.
"In February 2014, Minister for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Dan Jørgensen signed a regulation which banned ritual slaughter of animals without prior stunning.[18] Prior to this, religious groups could file for an exemption to the law that required stunning if they wanted to slaughter without prior stunning, although no groups had applied for such exemption. At the time, all halal slaughter in Denmark was performed with prior stunning, while kosher slaughter (which does not allow stunning) had not been practiced in Denmark since around 2004, all kosher meat being imported. In spite of this, the Muslim and Jewish Communities in Denmark strongly opposed the decree, arguing that it constituted an infringement upon religious freedom."
Seems we should follow Denmarks lead.
Its quite scary the power some of these minority groups can muster in order to lobby the government for a cause.
Though I guess with our lot they just cave in for fear of upsetting the *****************.
Yet bliar went to war killing tens of thousands of them!
- Joined
- 7 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 9,299
- Reaction score
- 3,720
- Country
Oh yes, you were there weren't you
. Arrogant git aren't you.Rogue, look up the caste system in India. You'll find people who won't even talk to others of a lower caste. So they're guilty of prejudice.
Urban mythology my ar*e.
Sponsored Links
