Comet 67P

Sponsored Links
What a shame that the first item on the BBC news this morning is about Ed Millipede and not the landing. I suppose Mr rubber face is more important to mankind :rolleyes:
 
It seems that while the crew were jumping for joy the lander was bouncing up and down. Hopefully it will have stopped bouncing and the various instruments will be able to function.

Still a remarkable achievement and all credit to the team for just getting it there after 3.5 billion miles and 10 years high speed travelling through space.
 
Sponsored Links
With the whole western world in dire straights financially, Is this not a diabolical waste of money as it only benefits the ego of a few clever people whose skills would be better spent on earth.
 
Oh I don't know; if we only ever focused on the current catastrophe, nothing would ever get done.
 
An absolute waste of money!! The millions and millions spent on tosh like this, that will help no one, would have been better spent trying to cure cancer etc.
 
The European Space Agency (ESA) approves the Rosetta mission: November 1993, at project inception the world was a different place than it is today.
Launched 2nd March 2004. Still a different place.

Costs ? :-
scienceogram-rosetta-1.1.png


-0-
 
With the whole western world in dire straights financially, Is this not a diabolical waste of money as it only benefits the ego of a few clever people whose skills would be better spent on earth.


You are dead right! What a waste of time and resources! It was the same a few hundred years ago when our forefathers set off in search of the Americas and Japans!!
 
A young graduate made the comment on Friday that the Rosetta project could not have happened without the present level of technology.

He was very red faced when it was pointed out that the technology on board is more than ten years old and has survived ten years travelling through space.
 
Old cliff and his shadows have put the mockers on'th project. :cry:

-0-
 
IS this the same piece of sh't thats conked out now because it's only getting 1hour of sun a day, and due to the fact it's bounced on an off the comet about 3 times pretty shagged already.

They dont even know what way up it's sitting. Didn't they pack a spirit level onboard ;)

Why didn't they use the same power supply the mars rover has, the bellends...has a min lifetime of 14 years.. Therefore still would of been running another 4years at least, no solar panels required.

Thermoelectric Generator or MMRTG.[25][26] Based on legacy RTG technology, it represents a more flexible and compact development step,[25] and is designed to produce 125 watts of electrical power from about 2,000 watts of thermal power at the start of the mission.[22][23] The MMRTG produces less power over time as its plutonium fuel decays: at its minimum lifetime of 14 years, electrical power output is down to 100 watts.[27][28] The power source will generate 9 MJ (2.5 kWh) each day, much more than the solar panels of the Mars Exploration Rovers, which can generate about 2.1 MJ (0.58 kWh) each day. The electrical output from the MMRTG charges two rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. This enables the power subsystem to meet peak power demands of rover activities when the demand temporarily exceeds the generator’s steady output level. Each battery has a capacity of about 42 amp-hours.

I say it's a waste of money and time, as someone else said, focus on fixing us first, cancer could be a good start. Otherwise if you gonna do it, do it properly.

I found that most amusing a cinema ticket twice as much as the mission cost. :D




[/b]
 
Why didn't they use the same power supply the mars rover has, the bellends...

You mean the one on the rover which weighs nine times as much as Philae?

The one which uses fuel which is only recently being manufactured again, after 25 years of no production?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top