Hi - my first post
I live in a 1930's semi and both mine and my neighbours property had the original roofs, with small red tiles. After a bit of a nightmare winter we decided to have the roof replaced this year, but the neighbours couldn't afford to have there's done.
The work was completed last week and to save time and money we went for larger tiles. I had 3 quotes and I'm pretty sure that all three said that they'd seperate the two properties with a "bonded gutter" (think that's the term they used). I discussed the project with my neighbour in advance and relayed the "bonded gutter" intention to him.
If I haven't got the term right, from street level it basically appears to be narrow channel of concrete/mortar (not sure if it's treated) which runs down the slope of both sides of the roof and into the guttering.
My neighbour collared me yesterday and said he's unhappy with the join and wants the two properties seperated by ridge tiles. He says he's worried that it will fail within a few winters. He claims that the use of ridge tiles is a better method, although I've no idea if he's right. I have looked at what other properties in my area have done in the same circs and it seems to be a mix of the two. If anything the ridge method seems to be on older looking jobs.
So, after a long-winded explanation, my question is whether or not my neighbour is correct and should I be worried about what I've had done. I was initially comforted by the fact that all the quotes I got proposed the same method and by the fact that other semi's appear to have been done the same.
Thanks
I live in a 1930's semi and both mine and my neighbours property had the original roofs, with small red tiles. After a bit of a nightmare winter we decided to have the roof replaced this year, but the neighbours couldn't afford to have there's done.
The work was completed last week and to save time and money we went for larger tiles. I had 3 quotes and I'm pretty sure that all three said that they'd seperate the two properties with a "bonded gutter" (think that's the term they used). I discussed the project with my neighbour in advance and relayed the "bonded gutter" intention to him.
If I haven't got the term right, from street level it basically appears to be narrow channel of concrete/mortar (not sure if it's treated) which runs down the slope of both sides of the roof and into the guttering.
My neighbour collared me yesterday and said he's unhappy with the join and wants the two properties seperated by ridge tiles. He says he's worried that it will fail within a few winters. He claims that the use of ridge tiles is a better method, although I've no idea if he's right. I have looked at what other properties in my area have done in the same circs and it seems to be a mix of the two. If anything the ridge method seems to be on older looking jobs.
So, after a long-winded explanation, my question is whether or not my neighbour is correct and should I be worried about what I've had done. I was initially comforted by the fact that all the quotes I got proposed the same method and by the fact that other semi's appear to have been done the same.
Thanks