Can someone please type the whole of the regs book out?

That's how much the library (Gloucestershire anyway) will let you photocopy of a British Standard. But IANAL.

Mmm.. that sounds like something not to admit to. :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
With regard to having a machine readable copy of a copyrighted document - I wonder if there is any offence committed by buying a paper copy of a document, scanning it and converting it to text completely for your own use.

It seems fair to me, but I don't think that the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows that. Some of the items mentioned are:

- possessing or dealing with infringing copies (BAS and others?)

Also that educational quotation is limited to 1% of the work per three-month period.

Incidentally, I personally will not be pasting any more, as I think that beyond the initial joke, it becomes an open invitation for trouble.
 
Yup

Suppose the joke has gone far enough.

Shame really, I just thought that so much of the regs is quoted on the forum, that it would so po mo iro to suggest the whole lot was put on. But as I am a nutcase and we are few. Not everyone got the humour and alas it is time to pull the plug on it.

Please don't type any more in.

I have a car outside, but my neighbours car is his and I shall not steal it.

Martin
 
Haven't read all this article but i bought the regs and i am currently studying for the 2391 course so if anyone wants to type a whole load of stuff orientated around testing and inpection be my guest! :LOL:

Wish Sparky heaven was still online! Practice papers and all sorts! :cry:
 
Sponsored Links
Haven't read all this article but i bought the regs and i am currently studying for the 2391 course so if anyone wants to type a whole load of stuff orientated around testing and inpection be my guest! :LOL:

Wish Sparky heaven was still online! Practice papers and all sorts!


:cry:


Electricianforum has some past papers I think
 
I think the IEE might have a copyright © issue with that one :D

Sure!

Page 1....

"© The Institution of Engineering and Technology and BSI

NO COPYING IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION"


Ooops...... :oops:
 
"© The Institution of Engineering and Technology and BSI

NO COPYING IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION"

Ooops...... :oops:
Well, except that that goes slightly further than the actual act, and to that extent is meaningless. The act does make certain provisions:

Chapter III of The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA 88 ) describes circumstances when copyright material can be reproduced without infringing copyright. These are generally referred to as the fair dealing provisions. The Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI 2003 No. 2498) amended certain provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. One of the most significant changes was to specify that the fair dealing provisions for research only applies where the copying is for a non-commercial purpose. This guidance reflects these changes. Under fair dealing, copyright material can be reproduced for the purposes of:

* Research for non-commercial purposes and private study; and
* For criticism, review and news reporting.
[From the Office of Public Sector Information]

On initial reading on the act itself, I draw the conclusion that the scanning of the document *entirely* for one's own use (private study - non-commercial) would be legally allowed, and that a small amount of quoting for literary criticism is also ok.

But that reproducing it purely for the benefit of others is clearly not allowed.
 
On initial reading on the act itself, I draw the conclusion that the scanning of the document *entirely* for one's own use (private study - non-commercial) would be legally allowed,
You're allowed (usually? always?) to make copies of software for backup purposes. So if you had BS 7671 on CD you could copy that.

If you have it on paper, are you/should you be allowed to copy it for backup purposes? If your house burns down might you be glad of a copy?

Did they stop selling the loose-leaf version of the regs because not enough people bought it, or because it made it too easy to scan?


But that reproducing it purely for the benefit of others is clearly not allowed.
If someone asks a question here, reproducing the relevant regulations is for their benefit, but clearly is not commercial. Does it qualify as "review and news reporting"?

If you quoted a particular reg, and then wrote "and I agree that it's a wonderful rule" would that qualify as criticism or review?
 
Haven't read all this article but i bought the regs and i am currently studying for the 2391 course so if anyone wants to type a whole load of stuff orientated around testing and inpection be my guest! :LOL:

Wish Sparky heaven was still online! Practice papers and all sorts! :cry:

It became SparkyResurrection
Try here http://sparkyr.multiply.com/

I don't know if it still has past papers etc.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top