Extractor Fan Isolator Switch????

About the only way round it that I can see is to use a DP light switch, one pole switching the light and the other pole switching the fan trigger. The light not via the FCU, and the fan trigger, fan live and N through the FCU.
How could you get "the fan trigger, fan live an N through the FCU"? At best, only one of the two L's would be fused.

The fan live, and N are direct from the FCU.
The fan trigger is from the FCU through one pole of the DP switch.

The light live and N are direct from the lighting circuit and not through the FCU.

[code:1] +------------------------------------------------------+
| |
N FAN |
LIGHT SL PL N--------------------------------+ |
L | | | |
| | +---------fan perm live---------+ | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| +-----SW1a-------------------------+ | |
| | | |
+-------------SW1b--+ L N |
| +-------+ |
| | load | |
| | FCU | |
| | supply| |
| +-+---+-+ |
| | | |
+----------------------+ | |
| | |
L N |
| | |
| | |
| +-------+
| |
v v[/code:1]
 
Sponsored Links
The fan live, and N are direct from the FCU. The fan trigger is from the FCU through one pole of the DP switch. The light live and N are direct from the lighting circuit and not through the FCU.
Ah, right - I misread/misunderstood what you wrote - apologies. Yes, that would work. However, given that we're talking a bathroom, the light switch is likely to be a pull one. One might therefore end up having to use a 45/50A one designed as a shower isolator (are they OK with frequent operatiom?), since I doubt one would easily (if at all) be able to find any other type of DP pull-switch.

Kind Regards, John
 
You are not seeing the reason for the isolator are you.

If the fan comes defective or a hazard and HAS to be isolated then without a 3 pole isolator the only way to remove the hazard is to turn off the lighting circuit at the CU. Do you want ( can you allow ) your tenants to live in a house with no lights until the fan is repaired.

I was always under the impression that the reason for a seperate fan isolator was so that if the fan needed to be worked on, it could be done without having to isolate the lighting - which would obviously be an issue if the bathroom didn't have a window.

The 'Electricians Guide to the Building Regs' actually states the requirement for seperate isolation of a fan if the bathroom doesn't have a window......it doesn't mention there being a requirement otherwise.

If you used the DP switch of an SFCU to switch the two L's, then the N wouldn't be switched - hence not true isolation.

Kind Regards, John

There is no requirement to isolate the neutral conductor in a TN system. (537.1.2)
 
You are not seeing the reason for the isolator are you.

If the fan comes defective or a hazard and HAS to be isolated then without a 3 pole isolator the only way to remove the hazard is to turn off the lighting circuit at the CU. Do you want ( can you allow ) your tenants to live in a house with no lights until the fan is repaired.

I was always under the impression that the reason for a seperate fan isolator was so that if the fan needed to be worked on, it could be done without having to isolate the lighting - which would obviously be an issue if the bathroom didn't have a window.

The 'Electricians Guide to the Building Regs' actually states the requirement for seperate isolation of a fan if the bathroom doesn't have a window......it doesn't mention there being a requirement otherwise.


There is no requirement to isolate the neutral conductor in a TN system. (537.1.2)


That is what I was led to believe also.
 
Sponsored Links
One might therefore end up having to use a 45/50A one designed as a shower isolator (are they OK with frequent operatiom?), since I doubt one would easily (if at all) be able to find any other type of DP pull-switch.

Kind Regards, John
I believe MK and Crabtree do/did pull cords in the region of 15Amp. Pig ugly if I recall though!! (Used one in an outhouse years ago).
 
You are not seeing the reason for the isolator are you.

If the fan comes defective or a hazard and HAS to be isolated then without a 3 pole isolator the only way to remove the hazard is to turn off the lighting circuit at the CU. Do you want ( can you allow ) your tenants to live in a house with no lights until the fan is repaired.

I was always under the impression that the reason for a seperate fan isolator was so that if the fan needed to be worked on, it could be done without having to isolate the lighting - which would obviously be an issue if the bathroom didn't have a window.

The 'Electricians Guide to the Building Regs' actually states the requirement for seperate isolation of a fan if the bathroom doesn't have a window......it doesn't mention there being a requirement otherwise.

If you used the DP switch of an SFCU to switch the two L's, then the N wouldn't be switched - hence not true isolation.

Kind Regards, John

There is no requirement to isolate the neutral conductor in a TN system. (537.1.2)

It's a good idea to have the ability to isolate any equipment that's fixed, for reasons outlined in other posts.
 
I was always under the impression that the reason for a seperate fan isolator was so that if the fan needed to be worked on, it could be done without having to isolate the lighting - which would obviously be an issue if the bathroom didn't have a window.
In the absence of any official explanation, one has to speculate. What you say certainly makes sense, and one would think is probably at least part of the explanation, but Bernard's point about being able to take a faulty fan off-line so as to allow lighting to work until the fan can be replaced/mended is another, oft-quoted (and 'reasonable') reason. AFAIAA, the regs themselves don't contain a specific requirement for fan isolators - so it's generally manufacturers who impose the requirement (without explanation of the reason). However, if you consider the 'reason' mentioned by Bernard, then ...
If you used the DP switch of an SFCU to switch the two L's, then the N wouldn't be switched - hence not true isolation.
There is no requirement to isolate the neutral conductor in a TN system. (537.1.2)
That's true in terms of the regs isolation requirements, but if there were a N-E fault in the fan (and, hopefully, an RCD protecting the circuit), inability to isolate the neutral would mean that the lighting could not be used until the faulty fan had been disconnected. [In any event, there are TT installations :) ].

Kind Regards, John
 
Would you concede that anything that could go wrong with the extractor fan in the bathroom could equally go wrong with a ceiling fan/light that you may have mounted in your living room?
 
Would you concede that anything that could go wrong with the extractor fan in the bathroom could equally go wrong with a ceiling fan/light that you may have mounted in your living room?

Yes, but you can switch them off.
 
Would you concede that anything that could go wrong with the extractor fan in the bathroom could equally go wrong with a ceiling fan/light that you may have mounted in your living room?

Yes, but you can switch them off.

What if the shaver socket on the lighting circuit goes on the fritz? Don't hear any one worrying about that. Just had a shaver socket that started humming strangly and acquired a crack in the front - never had a fan go wrong though.
 
Would you concede that anything that could go wrong with the extractor fan in the bathroom could equally go wrong with a ceiling fan/light that you may have mounted in your living room?

Yes, but you can switch them off.

What if the shaver socket on the lighting circuit goes on the fritz? Don't hear any one worrying about that. Just had a shaver socket that started humming strangly and acquired a crack in the front - never had a fan go wrong though.

I haven't heard anyone worry about that either, interesting point, but if one did short, then that'd be easier to disconnect.
 
Would you concede that anything that could go wrong with the extractor fan in the bathroom could equally go wrong with a ceiling fan/light that you may have mounted in your living room?
Yep, at least qualitatively (the bathroom environment may make faults a bit more common) ... but would not the manufactuer's instructions for that 'fan/light' also quite probably call for an all-pole isolator?

Kind Regards, John
 
What if the shaver socket on the lighting circuit goes on the fritz? Don't hear any one worrying about that. Just had a shaver socket that started humming strangly and acquired a crack in the front - never had a fan go wrong though.
Indeed - the argument can be extended to requiring separate isolators for any number of things, to the extent of becoming rather silly. What you need to understand that it is neither the Wiring Regs nor, necessarily, electricians (some certainly are no fans) who have produced this requirement for all-pole isolators for extractor fans - it is the manufacturers of the fans. We are just trying to guess their (unstated) reasons for imnposing the requirement.

Kind Regards, John
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top