RSJ Resting on timber lintel over window ?

Joined
21 Feb 2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
Location
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
As part of a dormer conversion (in a 1927 build semi) a 3.6m RSJ will be put into the first floor to support a 50x50 steel post that the centre steel RSJ will be terminating on in the loft floor (to make way for the staircase). This first floor RSJ at one end terminates on a timber lintel of a 600mm window. Is this ok or is it best to replace the timber with steel and can the 3.6 RSJ simply rest on the replacement steel or does it need to be bolted onto it?
Thanks in advance Jon
 
Sponsored Links
Doubtless folk will be along to say 'no, you can't do that', but in some cases, it is perfectly OK structurally.

It depends partly on the span and cross-section size of the timber beam, partly on the load the steel beam will be putting on it, and where along the timber beam the steel rests (at the centre or near the end?)

If the steel beam is carrying floor loading only, and is itself not too heavily loaded, you could well be OK, but have a word with your SE first.
 
It may be ok structurally but I don't think building control will approve what would happen if the lintel got burned in a fire.
 
Thanks for reply.
Timber lintel 3"x4" and the 3.6 RSJ is resting right at the edge, almost where the timber spans onto the brick. window span is 600mm.
The load will be a 6m Rsj that terminates on a 50x50 box steel post (which rests on 3.6rsj) in the centre of the loft which will bear the floor timbers.
 
Sponsored Links
Fire is not an issue whether the supporting beam is timber or replaced by steel. They will still both need to be finished in plasterboard to 30 mins fire resistance.

If it bears right at the end of the timber lintel, then it only needs to be checked for shear stress.

It matters not what the building inspector says - if calcs can be submitted to show that it is OK structurally, the council has to accept that.
 
It would take about an hour and £150 to replace.

How much would it cost to leave it be and prove it structurally?

I know what I would do.
 
How much would it cost to leave it be and prove it structurally?

Good point.

But presumably the steel coming onto it has been calculated by the SE. If so, the SE will already know the reaction of the steel beam onto the timber.

With that figure - say X kN - it is literally only a 10-second job using a very simple equation to check the shear stress on the timber.
 
Just to clarify, RSJ new position is here in red. Builder thinks it will be fine and I can see his point but he is happy to change the timber for concrete lintel if i'm worried overly about it..
 
Two questions :

1) Why has the beam moved south to the new position

2) What happened to the prop post "F" that the original beam location was carrying

Even in its intended location the detail of how the beam ends being supported on their "pads" should be shown, since the drawings tend to suggest it may be sitting on narrower pads (wall thickness) than the text states (300x150x100)
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top