Should we take more Syrian's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we had a re-run of the last election today, I wonder if people would vote the same way? Farage would probably be PM tomorrow.
 
Sponsored Links
Death, destruction and misery is on it's way.
The sensible people knew. We warned people for years.

The chaos you see now is nothing compared to what's ahead, it's merely the beginning of the end.

Batten down the hatches, Hell is on it's way.
 
Sponsored Links
I blame Tim Berners-Lee.
...for so much.

Economic crises? Pre t'interweb, some carp over the pond would reach these shores via a boat, smoothing the reaction.
Instantaneous news equals huge, "knee-jerk" responses.
Everybody and his dog thinks (wants to believe) that we all live like someone off Mtv Cribs. Which is probably why yoot stab each other, because they want a quick route to somewhere they think they ought to be.
 
what part of the word "NO" does Cameron not understand?.....................who helped the Lebanon when Syria was destroying that country?...........
 
May I ask those of you who believe we should encourage the admission of more immigrants from Africa and the Middle East to read this article?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...S-won-t-save-refugees-destroying-country.html

Before you dismiss this as being from the Daily Mail, and therefore being of no value, may I also invite you to cite any part(s) of the article and offer a clear and explicit criticism of it, giving your reasons for doing so?
No sign of any response from Gasman & co.
I can't say I'm surprised.
 
May I ask those of you who believe we should encourage the admission of more immigrants from Africa and the Middle East to read this article?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...S-won-t-save-refugees-destroying-country.html

Before you dismiss this as being from the Daily Mail, and therefore being of no value, may I also invite you to cite any part(s) of the article and offer a clear and explicit criticism of it, giving your reasons for doing so?
As far as balanced articles go, that one is as lop sided as any I've ever read.
 
The reason half of the world wants to come here is because of our imperialist history, many countries look up to us as the people who brought them 'civilisation'.
Nothing to do with the generous benefits system and free healthcare system, then?

Of course, those things go hand in hand with civilisation. I don't mind if some of my taxes pay towards clothing and feeding families who have escaped a hell on earth we helped fashion. Do you?
Yes.

At least your honest about your lack of compassion.

We shouldn't be letting any immigrants in. Period. But we certainly shouldn't be letting in ones from a certain religion. The reasons they are in crisis is because of their own people and religion. We don't need their ideology in Europe, because bleeding hearts who see a dead kid and have a knee-jerk reaction thinking they can save the world only endanger their own people.

If you were any kind of soldier, you would have realised that dewy-eyed sentiment will get you killed.

It didn't though, did it? And don't judge what kind of soldier I was, you're not fit to judge me.

You certainly have a skewed view of what a soldier is, but the personal insults are a digression from the thrust of the topic.

Do you think the we as a country played no part in the displacement of people from Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Sudan, it has all been caused by themselves?

Have a look into it, let me know what you find.

The Saudis are funding much of the organised slaughter. They need to take in the migrants that result. After all, the ones on the move are all in the same club.
 
That maybe so, but with 20,000,000 people on the move, you let us know where they will all go.

How many new mosques will we need to build?

So we can't take all. So we should take none?

We've already grown our population by 4 million in the last few years. Projected to reach 70 million by 2027 - even before the current swarms. When will you admit that enough is enough? When our services completely break down?

Whilst your sentiments may be admirable, as usual, those who gush about saving the poor, suffering coffee-coloured ones aren't hard-wired to reality. Anyway, I'm not sure that our hard pressed security services could cope with a surge in the ROP population.
 
That maybe so, but with 20,000,000 people on the move, you let us know where they will all go.

How many new mosques will we need to build?

So we can't take all. So we should take none?

We've already grown our population by 4 million in the last few years. Projected to reach 70 million by 2027 - even before the current swarms. When will you admit that enough is enough? When our services completely break down?

Whilst your sentiments may be admirable, as usual, those who gush about saving the poor, suffering coffee-coloured ones aren't hard-wired to reality. Anyway, I'm not sure that our hard pressed security services could cope with a surge in the ROP population.

I saw Vette Cooper and Sturgeon interviewed on Sky news int. this morning. Both were asked point blank if they would take immigrants into one of their homes. Cooper said "yes if it becomes really necessary". I thought it was already?? Sturgeon changed the subject angle. Both referred to local authorities taking the lead. Strange that.
 
May I ask those of you who believe we should encourage the admission of more immigrants from Africa and the Middle East to read this article?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...S-won-t-save-refugees-destroying-country.html

Before you dismiss this as being from the Daily Mail, and therefore being of no value, may I also invite you to cite any part(s) of the article and offer a clear and explicit criticism of it, giving your reasons for doing so?
As far as balanced articles go, that one is as lop sided as any I've ever read.
That's easy to say.
Can you be more specific. Pick out any sentence that you feel able to criticise and say why.
He won't!
 
Can you be more specific. Pick out any sentence that you feel able to criticise and say why.
He won't!
People who are pro-immigration will paint a different picture, one that says the influx of migrants means cheap labour etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top