Quoting

ban-all-sheds · 9 May 2016

Yay...

Himaginn · 9 May 2016

ban-all-sheds said:
Yay...

It works!
Thank you admin.

ban-all-sheds · 29 Dec 2016

It's broken again.

Gasop · 30 Dec 2016

ban-all-sheds said:
It's broken again.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

rsgaz · 30 Dec 2016

ban-all-sheds said:
It's broken again.

Surface socket box for square conduit/trunking.

It's not a new 'feature'.

See my edit at the bottom, during your 'vacation'!

ban-all-sheds · 30 Dec 2016

Yeah but....

It was broken.

People complained.

They mended it.

People were pleased.

Now it is broken again.

ban-all-sheds · 17 Jan 2017

[BUMP]Any thoughts, DIYnot? Losing nested quotes can make it difficult to keep sufficient context in replies.[/BUMP]

ban-all-sheds · 25 May 2017

BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP

This is still a real problem.

I wanted to reply to this post: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/is-it-ok-to.482972/page-2#post-3912360 and refer directly to some of the things which Eric wrote. But because he wrote them as quotes, when I quote his post most of it vanishes, and all I am left with is this:

ericmark said:
I am sorry to muddy the waters with the 3 meter thing, my point was we didn't have a clue when I wrote it if from a radial, or ring. There was as I saw it a problem in although likely no problem, there was a possible problem and we simply did not have the info to say if there was or not, since now we know it is from the ring final and reasonably central on the ring with a FCU we can not say yes no problem. But when I answered I did not know that.

For interest only it stated:-

Please note amendment 2 or 3 may have changed the wording slightly. 433.2.2 was an "or" but 434.2.1 is an "and" on my copy. May be this has now changed as I don't have amendment 2 or 3. However in this case it really does not matter as the FCU is well within the 3 meters and even if it were not there seems to be some uncertainty as to if this applies to a ring final.

This feature does not help me. It does not help anybody. It brings no benefits whatsoever.

PLEASE FIX IT.

IWalkLikeHimaMartian · 25 May 2017

If it is of any help, I do not suppose anyone would be too concerned if it did not work in GD.
No-one seems to read the responses well in GD anyway.

Quoting

Similar threads