Vaxxed ....... De Niro .......Andrew Wakefield ......

gasbanni

gasbanni

Joined
7 Jan 2007
Messages
8,836
Reaction score
1,230
Country
United Kingdom
Before the cry's of Qwack start, I saw this point a chap says " Do you remember hearing about autism when you were a kid ?" to a 50 year old. "No" Then states A graph of autism cases and vaccine uptake are vitally the same.

Vaxxed is not an anti vaccine film it's about the research fraud.

I still, maintain Wakefield is a hero the other chap that also published the paper has been vindicated his union could cover the legal fees Wakefields could not .......




Then you've got this .......4PwCYMdFtEohttps://youtu.be/

And this ........ht_H9MXnLUdMEtps://youtu.be/

And this .........

The day will come when Wakefield will be indicated period.
 
Sponsored Links
Gas my boy you really are the easiest mark on the planet. Wakefield is a quack, he has been debunked his work discredited and he was a paid shill.

How do you cope everyday with all these conspiracy theories? Its no wonder you get the wool pulled over your eyes.
 
Not only is Wakefield a fraud, but said "further research is needed to determine whether MMR may give rise to this complication in a small number of people". This has been done many times, at great expense, and no link has ever been found. Vaccines are in use for a reason, and it isn't profit, its to reduce disease, which they do very effectively.
 
Sponsored Links
wobs said:
Vaccines are in use for a reason, and it isn't profit, its to reduce disease, which they do very effectively.
Click to expand...

Well....let me ask you 4 questions (before I 'dump' a great deal of actual data)

1. Have YOU watched the documentary 'Vaxxed'?
2. Have YOU done YOUR own research into autism?
3. If so....then YOU know the date that mandatory vaccination was first brought into law in the UK! When was that?
4. Why are pharmaceutical companies, who create and SELL the vaccines, immune (<<funny that) from ANY LAWSUITS and YOU as a tax payer PAY for any harm caused? Heres a link to the UK government website which deals with vaccine harmed CHILDREN and PAYS OUT in YOUR name.... oh no I don't need to list it as I am sure YOU as a informed and intelligent 'individual' already have the address!
 
You SHOULD reconsider your FOOLISH use of CAPITALS which add 'nothing' to your POST
 
JohnD said:
You SHOULD reconsider your FOOLISH use of CAPITALS which add 'nothing' to your POST
Click to expand...

LMFAO ....that is ....laugh my f**king ar@e off at YOUR stupidity

Done any research jo boy? You know, actually self considered? Looked at both sides and formed YOUR OWN consideration?
Have you?
 
yes, because I am not a numbskull like you.
 
JohnD said:
yes, because I am not a numbskull like you.
Click to expand...


So answer the 4 questions then jo boy. Here let me repeat them:

1. Have YOU watched the documentary 'Vaxxed'?
2. Have YOU done YOUR own research into autism?
3. If so....then YOU know the date that mandatory vaccination was first brought into law in the UK! When was that?
4. Why are pharmaceutical companies, who create and SELL the vaccines, immune (<<funny that) from ANY LAWSUITS and YOU as a tax payer PAY for any harm caused?

These are very simple questions in order to start a real conversation into whether the use of 'vaccinations' are safe?
I have many more questions for you.......but for these it becomes necessary that YOU can actually THINK for YOURself!

(please note the use of capitalization as it refers to YOU) lol
 
Lmfao said:
Well....let me ask you 4 questions (before I 'dump' a great deal of actual data)

1. Have YOU watched the documentary 'Vaxxed'?
Click to expand...
youtube is hardly a good source of information. When someone has some scientific report about this, I'll look up.

2. Have YOU done YOUR own research into autism?
Click to expand...
Yes thank you. Such as the progress that has been made in diagnosis, resulting in an increase in cases.
3. If so....then YOU know the date that mandatory vaccination was first brought into law in the UK! When was that?
Click to expand...
Try never, as it isn't mandatory in the UK.
4. Why are pharmaceutical companies, who create and SELL the vaccines, immune (<<funny that) from ANY LAWSUITS and YOU as a tax payer PAY for any harm caused? Heres a link to the UK government website which deals with vaccine harmed CHILDREN and PAYS OUT in YOUR name.... oh no I don't need to list it as I am sure YOU as a informed and intelligent 'individual' already have the address!
Click to expand...
If you have any evidence, please feel free to provide it, but try to remember that pharmaceutical companies make more profit from treating diseases than they do from vaccines.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w9833.pdf

As has been said, capitals don't actually help your case.
 
So....Wobs, no you haven't watched the documentary 'Vaxxed'. Therefore you should not be posting uninformed ideas in this thread, as the thread is about the documentary 'Vaxxed'.

Then....if you haven't watched it YOU have no actual self researched concepts to present. YOU are misinformed and therefore a danger to others.

Mandatory vaccination was first made law in the UK in 1873. Go read old books. Here's one:
Title: Compulsory Vaccination
Report of a Public Meeting, held in the Marylebone Vestry Hall, London, on Wednesday evening, October 19, 1870.

Thats 1870. There are the 'acts' of 1840, 1853, 1867 and 1871 to also consider? Wonder if YOU will????

Lets 'dump' a quick paper here for YOUR consideration (main stream sh%t, but thats all you consider)

VaxVsUnvaxed%20Survey%20Graphic-Updated.png


Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children.pdf

It is a PDF and YOU will have to download it and actually READ it....lol

A quick bullet point summary:

*Vaccinated children were more than three times as likely to be diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum (OR 4.3)

*Vaccinated children were 30-fold more likely to be diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (hay fever) than non-vaccinated children

* Vaccinated children were 22-fold more likely to require an allergy medication than unvaccinated children

*Vaccinated children had more than quadruple the risk of being diagnosed with a learning disability than unvaccinated children (OR 5.2)

*Vaccinated children were 300 percent more likely to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder than unvaccinated children (OR 4.3)

* Vaccinated children were 340 percent (OR 4.4) more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia than unvaccinated children

*Vaccinated children were 300 percent more likely to be diagnosed with an ear infection than unvaccinated children (OR 4.0)

*Vaccinated children were 700 percent more likely to have surgery to insert ear drainage tubes than unvaccinated children (OR 8.01)

* Vaccinated children were 2.5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with any chronic illness than unvaccinated children


Here is a link to the UK Gov page regarding vaccination damage:

Vaccine Damage Payment

And on the 'claim form' it quotes the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/17/contents
so go read that. As an aside....I am not trying to present a case. I care not for you nor your children....until YOU begin to become an individual and think for YOUR self. :)
 
Lmfao
There are an infinite number of documents you haven't read.

So you will agree you are not qualified to speak about medical frauds, and Mr Wakefield.
 
qualified

lets 'print' the word again.... qualified

No john, I have not read every single piece of research. Am I qualified?

Off on a tangent for a minute.... Otto Warberg in 1931 won the noble prize in medicine for his paper regarding the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.

In this paper (which you will find very difficult to obtain) he stated and proved that cancer cannot exist in an alkaline environment. That cancer requires an acidic environment to propagate.
Your body is meant to be slightly ph negitive around 7.34

All 'cancers' have an underling acidosis but the acidosis is never addressed as a cause.

Over the last 100 years greater than 1 trillion pounds, worldwide, has been invested into the 'search' for a cancer remedy. The 'cancer' problem is a multi billion pound per year industry which will only grow via medical corporations promotion.

There is no search for a 'cure'. There is only a want for customers.

You ask me about 'Medical Frauds'. I wear no 'white coat'....but that 'white coat' is YOUR belief and YOU pay for that coat along with your children. They are payed.

If they were no 'sick' people....consider this and the 'cost' to the capitalist world?
 
lmfa posts a document link

"Vaccination status was classified as unvaccinated (i.e., no
previous vaccinations), partially vaccinated (received some but not
all recommended vaccinations) and fully vaccinated (received all
recommended age-appropriate vaccines), as reported by mothers...
...Dates of vaccinations were not requested in order not to overburden
respondents and to reduce the likelihood of inaccurate reporting; nor
was information requested on adverse events related to vaccines, as
this was not our purpose. We also did not ask about dates of diagnoses"

so the data is not from official sources and is not verified. The mothers put down whatever they felt like.

How were the cases selected and randomised? Was it a representative sample?

"A number of homeschool mothers volunteered"

So it was a self-selected group.

The study actually disregarded data that could have shown if problems arose before of after diagnosis (the same defect as Mr Wakefield's study, except that we now know he fraudulently included children whose illness was diagnosed prior to vaccination).

"These categories were developed on the premise that any long-term
effects of vaccines would be more evident in fully-vaccinated than in
partially-vaccinated children, and rare or absent in the unvaccinated.
Mothers were asked to use their child’s vaccination records to indicate
the recommended vaccines and doses their child had received."

So they'd decided what result they wanted to find, in advance of choosing the "evidence."

I won't waste time on lmfao's source.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top