Is safety an optional extra?

That sadly is DP's problem...

Putting forward nothing of value ...

Whatever the topic!
Unlike you,i am waiting until the aircraft crash is investigated and reported.Unlike you lot with your crystal ball,,dual purpose for brexit and boeing 737 crashes.
 
Sponsored Links
Unlike you,i am waiting until the aircraft crash is investigated and reported.Unlike you lot with your crystal ball,,dual purpose for brexit and boeing 737 crashes.

Who made a decision on Brexit where there was no plan, nothing.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahah

You proven once again just how dumb you are and transparent in your stupidity.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/business/boeing-737-max-crash.html

Wonderful read.

His internal assembly designs for the Max, he said, still include omissions today, like not specifying which tools to use to install a certain wire, a situation that could lead to a faulty connection. Normally such blueprints include intricate instructions.

“Any designs we created could not drive any new training that required a simulator,” Mr. Ludtke said. “That was a first.”

When upgrading the cockpit with a digital display, he said, his team wanted to redesign the layout of information to give pilots more data that were easier to read. But that might have required new pilot training.

So instead, they simply recreated the decades-old gauges on the screen. “We just went from an analog presentation to a digital presentation,” Mr. Ludtke said. “There was so much opportunity to make big jumps, but the training differences held us back.”

“This program was a much more intense pressure cooker than I’ve ever been in,” he added. “The company was trying to avoid costs and trying to contain the level of change. They wanted the minimum change to simplify the training differences, minimum change to reduce costs, and to get it done quickly.”

 
Who made a decision on Brexit where there was no plan, nothing.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahah

You proven once again just how dumb you are and transparent in your stupidity.
Ok Dude
 
Sponsored Links
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/business/boeing-737-max-crash.html

Wonderful read.

His internal assembly designs for the Max, he said, still include omissions today, like not specifying which tools to use to install a certain wire, a situation that could lead to a faulty connection. Normally such blueprints include intricate instructions.

“Any designs we created could not drive any new training that required a simulator,” Mr. Ludtke said. “That was a first.”

When upgrading the cockpit with a digital display, he said, his team wanted to redesign the layout of information to give pilots more data that were easier to read. But that might have required new pilot training.

So instead, they simply recreated the decades-old gauges on the screen. “We just went from an analog presentation to a digital presentation,” Mr. Ludtke said. “There was so much opportunity to make big jumps, but the training differences held us back.”

“This program was a much more intense pressure cooker than I’ve ever been in,” he added. “The company was trying to avoid costs and trying to contain the level of change. They wanted the minimum change to simplify the training differences, minimum change to reduce costs, and to get it done quickly.”
Will wait for the accident report.
 
Unlike you,i am waiting until the aircraft crash is investigated and reported.Unlike you lot with your crystal ball,

I too await the official report on what is found by the investigations.

The one good thing about public speculation about the cause(s) of the accidents is that scrutiny of the reports will be intense and it will be very difficult for anyone to cover up any errors and ommissions that led to the accidents happening.
 
An experienced aviator offers a reasoned view.
The accidents and MCAS.

-0-
 
Cars used to (mostly) be extensively tested before release.
More so nowadays, first buyers are the guinea pigs.
At least cars don't fall out of the sky......
 
Unlike you,i am waiting until the aircraft crash is investigated and reported.Unlike you lot with your crystal ball,,dual purpose for brexit and boeing 737 crashes.
Maybe you ought to have a word with the CEO of Boeing...
Although I've a feeling he might have had the 'heads up' beforehand, and has basically admitted responsibility before said investigation has been completed...

But since you bring up Brexit, maybe we have something to learn that might apply?

On a 'journey', the well being of the people taking that journey seems to depend on what the sensors on the 'left' and what the sensors on the 'right' are saying.
However when the sensors wildly disagree, they call on an 'arbiter' to make a decision - a decision based of course on false readings.
The 'arbiter', instead of allowing those with the well being of all of the people on that 'journey' take the appropriate actions, decides on a different course...

Crash and Burn!

Sounds familiar?
 

One line from the preliminary report. AOA = angle of attack

At 05:38:44, shortly after liftoff, the left and right recorded AOA values deviated. Left AOA decreased to 11.1° then increased to 35.7° while value of right AOA indicated 14.94°. Then after, the left AOA value reached 74.5° in ¾ seconds while the right AOA reached a maximum value of 15.3°

Hence the MCAS system was getting invalid data which was indicating incorrectly to the MCAS that a stall was about to happen without the pilots being aware of it.

( i will not post the link to where this report can be read in order to protect it from Brexit infected trolls ) .
 
Maybe you ought to have a word with the CEO of Boeing...
Don't need too..Sir Gal knows more than the whole of the Boeing engineering staff and crash investigators,even before the investigation.
 
On a 'journey', the well being of the people taking that journey seems to depend on what the sensors on the 'left' and what the sensors on the 'right' are saying.
However when the sensors wildly disagree, they call on an 'arbiter' to make a decision - a decision based of course on false readings.
The 'arbiter', instead of allowing those with the well being of all of the people on that 'journey' take the appropriate actions, decides on a different course...
Lal man...LAL..even for you,,,that is a nonsense analogy.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top