S
sodthisforfun
Lol, I didn't start it!Your so patronising
Lol, I didn't start it!Your so patronising
Lol, I didn't start it!
It is fine now, thank you, a bit touch & go at the time.How is your septicemia?
What makes no difference? I know what context means, I just can't figure out what context you're actually referring to. The fact that it was meant as a joke? The fact that it was said by a professional comedian? The fact that it was on the BBC? The fact that it was said during a period when acid-attacks and political division are hot-button current issues?And no, makes no difference. He's a comedian, same as Brand.
It is fine now, thank you, a bit touch & go at the time.
It is fine now, thank you, a bit touch & go at the time.
She is a comedian, it was said in jest, on a comedy show. This is the context. This is important.What makes no difference? I know what context means, I just can't figure out what context you're actually referring to. The fact that it was meant as a joke? The fact that it was said by a professional comedian? The fact that it was on the BBC? The fact that it was said during a period when acid-attacks and political division are hot-button current issues?
PS, I do not think this whole shebang has been quiet in Jo Brands favour. She's being punished by the press and all the social media. Does it really matter who's doing the punishing?I remember doing a double-take when I heard that comment first broadcast while I was making my tea, as it was unusually bad taste for Radio 4 (or politically-correct FM as I like to call it). The trouble is the double-standard currently pervasive in the media (and social media) class. If a right-wing personality had made the same joke it would be all over the Guardian front page before you can say "twitter storm". Anna Soubry would be calling for new legistlation; Owen Jones would be writing about the rise of incitement to populist Nazi street violence; David Lammy would be tweeting furiously about how it mocks the horrific suffering of actual acid-attack victims; Sadiq Kahn would make a little video about how all Londoner's agree it won't divide them; police cars would have extra H8-speech stickers on standby.
But when it's celebrated feminist joe Brand, suddenly the same people are uncharacteristically quiet. "It's just a joke bro, what's your problem Nigel I thought you were pro free speech, it's not incitement if you're on the right side, you're making a fuss about nothing, lol what a censorious stick in the mud!"
Whatever you say Bodd.You did
And my point was if the same comment had been made by the 'wrong' (e.g. white, male, right wing) comedian the relatively relaxed reaction of the media, twitter, parliament and BBC would have been the polar opposite.She is a comedian, it was said in jest, on a comedy show. This is the context. This is important.
I assume you meant to say left, and it would be disingenuous. Brand is avowedly (notoriously, even) politically left-wing and has built vast portions of her material and public personality on promulgating left-wing issues, which is why the London elite have been so forgiving of her on this.She ISN'T a right-wing person, she is a comedian doing her job.
Well done, but if Jim Davidson or Nigel farage had said it the papers would be accusing him of incitement, or at least of encouraging or enabling incitement. I suspect you didn't read my post at all.She didn't incite violence, she said she wouldn't do it
1, IF. But it wasn't, so it's not the same context.And my point was if the same comment had been made by the 'wrong' (e.g. white, male, right wing) comedian the relatively relaxed reaction of the media, twitter, parliament and BBC would have been the polar opposite.
I assume you meant to say left, and it would be disingenuous. Brand is avowedly (notoriously, even) politically left-wing and has built vast portions of her material and public personality on promulgating left-wing issues, which is why the London elite have been so forgiving of her on this.
Well done, but if Jim Davidson or Nigel farage had said it the papers would be accusing him of incitement, or at least of encouraging or enabling incitement. I suspect you didn't read my post at all.
Nope.Are you telling me that a comedian doesn't write comedy
Are you inferring that a person who writes comedy is a comedian in the entertainer sense of the word?
So it's chalk and cheese to compare the two.
Nope.
Now answer my question please....