Honest politicians, hooray!

Ihavenojob · 18 Sep 2019

ellal said:
Ah, so just because you think that if you provide a school then everyone gets the same opportunity?

If they turn up and pay attention. Trouble these days is pupils are not allowed to be told what to do, teachers can't insist they stay and learn Schools like to have several "difficult" pupils, it allows them to be labelled so the school receives more funds.

durhamplumber · 18 Sep 2019

Ihavenojob said:
why isn't every person on benefits queueing up at the local food bank ? It comes back to a word I mentioned previously- priorities.

Good point well put

fillyboy · 18 Sep 2019

JohnD said:
When criticised by a young patient's father

who just happened to be a Labour activist, still, at least he didn't mention Brexit.

Notch7 · 19 Sep 2019

Ihavenojob said:
Basically, yes. It's not my fault. Everyone I went to school with had the same opportunity , some are possibly doing better than me, some possibly worse. I took control of my life and didn't take risks. People need to stop relying on others to sort their own sh1t out, all the time they have someone to dig them out of a hole , they will never change. The new thing now is an online begging bowl called go fund me ( or go pay for my lifestyle I can't afford), always thought begging was illegal in the UK, but it seems people have no shame as well as no desire to sort themselves out.

You have taken the attitude of a minority of those on benefits and applied it to every person on benefits.

why would you do that?
is it because you use it justify your selfish attitude

or is it because you just have complacent thinking.

or are you too stupid to understand the reality

or is it all 3

Notch7 · 19 Sep 2019

Ihavenojob said:
And do you think that none of those will have a smart phone ? Priorities is an unknown word to some.

can you show the proof that every person on benefits has a smart phone?

I suppose you think a phone isnt useful for a person on benefits.

Can you think of a good reason why somebody unemployed might find a phone useful?

or do think its priorities? -they should spend their money on food not phone top up.

Notch7 · 19 Sep 2019

fillyboy said:
who just happened to be a Labour activist, still, at least he didn't mention Brexit.

he also has a very ill son -but you dont care

Ihavenojob · 19 Sep 2019

Notchy is clutching at straws, he has no real proof to discredit anything I or anyone else has said.

festive · 19 Sep 2019

Notch7 said:
You have taken the attitude of a minority of those on benefits and applied it to every person on benefits.

why would you do that?
is it because you use it justify your selfish attitude

or is it because you just have complacent thinking.

or are you too stupid to understand the reality

or is it all 3

This kids is a classic example of what too much time on the internet does to you... take note.

ellal · 19 Sep 2019

Ihavenojob said:
Schools like to have several "difficult" pupils, it allows them to be labelled so the school receives more funds.

That'll be why the practice of "off-rolling" is so prevalent then

"The report raises concerns about the excessive use of both formal and informal exclusions.

It warned of so-called "off-rolling", in which difficult pupils were taken off a school's register and moved to another setting, such as a pupil referral unit or home education.

The MPs were told that this could be driven by schools wanting to have better exam statistics in performance tables."

Linky

Linky Linky

"Some people believe schools are increasingly “playing” the system – getting rid of students who might do badly in their GCSEs and compromise the school’s performance in league tables.

An Ofsted investigation into the practice of “off-rolling” – where pupils disappear from the school register just before GCSEs – found that more than 19,000 pupils who were in year 10 in 2016 had vanished from the school roll by the start of year 11, the year when pupils sit their GCSEs."

Rather different from what you claim, eh?

durhamplumber · 19 Sep 2019

Notch7 said:
or do think its priorities? -they should spend their money on food not phone top up

What do you think Notchy. ...wait 'til you are starving then chew your phone if you are unsure....down to your last fiver....not eaten or drank for a week!!!...go on...tell me you would top your phone up!

Notch7 · 19 Sep 2019

durhamplumber said:
What do you think Notchy. ...wait 'til you are starving then chew your phone if you are unsure....down to your last fiver....not eaten or drank for a week!!!...go on...tell me you would top your phone up!

Would you like somebody on benefits to get a job?

noseall · 19 Sep 2019

It would be considered very foolish, rich or poor to not have a smart phone (even a cheap second hand one) in todays' phone/app dominated climate.

Ihavenojob said:
Schools like to have several "difficult" pupils, it allows them to be labelled so the school receives more funds.

Utter nonsense.

Ihavenojob · 19 Sep 2019

ellal said:
Rather different from what you claim, eh?

[QUOTE="noseall,

Utter nonsense.[/QUOTE]
Yep, you're all right, schools get no extra funding for special needs children, they just send them all home.

Ihavenojob · 19 Sep 2019

So apparently, it seems,according to notchy, that all benefit claimant's use the food banks,and none have smart phones. Poor pathetic Notchy.

noseall · 19 Sep 2019

Ihavenojob said:
Yep, you're all right

I know. Schools don't like to have several difficult pupils. What you said is utter nonsense.

Honest politicians, hooray!

durhamplumber

durhamplumber

Similar threads