Beirut, huge explosion video

Anyway back to the topic theres a lot of rumour about who exactly is behind this bombing. even trumps generals are saying this was no accident.
 
Sponsored Links
this bombing

oh, you've decided it was a bombing, have you?

What compelling evidence have you seen?

presumably you agree that Buncefield was also a bombing?

_86872479_tommargesson.jpg



_86872371_bunce_satt_nasa.jpg


or do you put that down to poor industrial safety in a backward country?
 
Heaven forbid the locals decide they want to live in a way that THEY want, a system of their choice, values of their choices, laws of their choice. Which is exactly what the Iranian revolution was about. Just like the British voting for brexit.

I wonder if anyone bothered to ask the Iranian women what they wanted...
 
Sponsored Links
oh, you've decided it was a bombing, have you?

What compelling evidence have you seen?

presumably you agree that Buncefield was also a bombing?

_86872479_tommargesson.jpg



_86872371_bunce_satt_nasa.jpg


or do you put that down to poor industrial safety in a backward country?

geeza look at the explosion, that was a bombing, that wasnt no fireworks or fertilisers going off by accident. they was a detonation.
 
well many of them seem deeply devoted to their branch of shia islam. you see huge crowds of women at religious gatherings.
Didn't really answer my question and your example is that of women today with their of life now, 40 years on..

At the time of the revolution, thousands and thousands of women protested against the turning back of the clock on womens rights. They had rocks thrown at them for not wearing a headscarf etc, told them one by one all the things they could no longer do and the things they now had to do...

No, I think it's fair to say that the Iranian men didn't really care what a lot of the women wanted...
 
Nobody with any sense believes the bomb /attack theory.
There's an existing paper trail following a Moldovan cargo ship transporting fertiliser arriving in port after mechanical trouble.
The authorities were worried about the ship as it was unseaworthy.
The Russian in charge lives in Cyprus, he abandoned the crew.
The authorities basically didn't know what to do so stuck it in a warehouse.
 
Nobody with any sense believes the bomb /attack theory.
There's an existing paper trail following a Moldovan cargo ship transporting fertiliser arriving in port after mechanical trouble.
The authorities were worried about the ship as it was unseaworthy.
The Russian in charge lives in Cyprus, he abandoned the crew.
The authorities basically didn't know what to do so stuck it in a warehouse.

Full timeline of events from the Guardian.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...w-and-what-we-don-t/ar-BB17Et5a?ocid=msedgntp
 
Got you.

You think that "compelling evidence" means "speculation by a journalist who is an analyst for Russian government-funded RT and Sputnik News and quotes an anonymous and unverified source."

When (if) you do have some compelling evidence, let us know.
 
It's strange that fantasist gasbusters thinks that a nuclear bomb explodes slowly, starting with a small fire and red flashes that give people time to look at it and start taking photos and videos, before growing into a large fire, followed by an explosion that does not burn out the eyeballs of observers nor the lenses of cameras.

I wonder when gasbuster's "slow-burn" nuke was invented.

Perhaps this is a new kind of nuke that generates no radioactive fallout.

Luckily gasbuster's tinfoil hat will protect him.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top