The oil based Dulux Trade Weathershield gloss is supposed to provide 8 years of protection. Where-as the waterbased version is 6 years.
Strangely the retail Dulux Weathershield oil based says 10 years and the retail waterbased 6 years.
Frankly, I do not believe that their retail paints are superior to the trade version and suspect that they use different organisations with different testing methodologies.
Personally I don't pay much attention to the life expectancy listed on the tins. When, for example, painting a window, the key failure points are where the styles and rails meet. If you don't use the right fillers they may develop cracks which will allow water ingress, and subsequently result in the paint de-laminating at those points.
As a professional decorator who works primarily on Victorian houses, I often find myself sanding through numerous coats of paint on sliding sash windows, back to when they were first painted. I do from time to time, come across paint work where the last coat is flaking even though the paint underneath is sound. I work on the assumption the last time it was painted, the painter didn't bother providing a sufficient key, or possibly used an inferior paint. Exterior paints have additives that allow the molecules to vibrate as they absorb the energy from UV light, additionally they have fungicides in levels higher than found in interior paints. In theory, they are more flexible and some claim to be micro porous (ie allowing moisture out but not in, I have long wondered if that is just marketing hyperbole).
I opt for the oil Dulux Trade Weathershield paints because they have been consistently reliable and I know their quirks. I do not believe that the current version is superior to the pre 2010 version though. In 2010 an EU VOC directive forced manufacturers to reduce the solvent content of their paints. Initially paints were awful, they have improved since though.
From memory DT Weathershield used to be rated for 10 years prior to the VOC compliant version. I may be mistaken though.