D
durhamplumber
Googled it!Where did you cut and paste this from?
Googled it!Where did you cut and paste this from?
Covid is real.
It is getting much worse than it's so-called heydays in March / April. My sibling who is an NHS doctor has tested positive. He wore full PPE - mask, gloves, overalls, face shields etc. but even that was not enough to protect him from infected patients. Which makes me think - are masks good enough? How many infected people do we walk past everyday?
Any anti-lockdown/anti-mask protester needs to be bitc-slapped.
Some will take drugs just to look good for the weekend.....Taking drugs you mean? To up there blood cell count etc?
If you're a reader or anyone else here if you haven't read it read 'Breaking the chain' its a fantastic account of the rife drug abuse in the pro cycle world in the 80s. Not much of a reader but found it a riveting fascination read cover to cover. A real eye opener on the lengths they went to avoid detection and the risks they took with their health to gain that edge.Same in amateur cycle racing. I never made it much up the ranks but people are cheating even in category 3.
What's to say he caught it from a patient or even at the hospital?
What's to say he caught it from a patient or even at the hospital?
I thought they had revised that when it became necessary to persuade more to wear them.Masks - in out case it's to prevent us giving it to others and not for protecting us from catching it.
I think they proved they helped with the viral load? Making the symptoms less severe.Masks - in out case it's to prevent us giving it to others and not for protecting us from catching it. Might help a touch though.
Too many big words there for you to possibly understand from your google search?The problem with this reasoning is that it avoids engaging with the issue at hand, and instead shifts attention to extreme hypotheticals. Because no proof is presented to show that such extreme hypotheticals will in fact occur, this fallacy has the form of an appeal to emotion fallacy by leveraging fear. In effect the argument at hand is unfairly tainted by unsubstantiated conjecture.
As long as you understand them lAL!Your slippery slope argument is wrongToo many big words there for you to possibly understand from your google search?
I thought they had revised that when it became necessary to persuade more to wear them.
Hey ho...Your slippery slope argument is wrong
Indeed.And you are the proverbial stubborn Mule LaL..Hey ho...
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink
Boris did not create the vaccine.Too many big words there for you to possibly understand from your google search?
But how about we listen to what our now absent 'leader' has said...
'We will follow the science' he espoused...
But he only 'follows the science' when it suits, and heaps the blame on the 'science' when it opposes his political objectives...
Then we have the chaos at the highest level with goebbels being replaced by carrie and her 'gang', so who knows who is actually in control!
Thus it is reasonable to object to another attempt to curtail freedom of speech or thought...
Because who in the end does that favour?
Better to have an educated population and a transparent system...
It seems at present we have the opposite!
"Dispatches"Lockdown crisis:How the govt lost control""..No prizes for guessing the tone of that one......Followed by...."smart meters:govt is going to use them to turn OAP heating off so they freeze and die""C4 Dispatches at 9pm tonight is on covid and how it's been handled