Other peoples work

Joined
12 Jan 2008
Messages
8,763
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Essex
Country
United Kingdom
Sponsored Links
Must be a record for amount of lugs on a banjo bolt.
Yes, maybe!

Given their extensive use of Wagos for everything else, one can but assume that they did it 'deliberately'. Maybe they thought (perhaps even correctly?) that it was 'the lesser of evils' to have each of the CPCs 'bolted to the box', rather than sticking them all into Wago(s) and having just a ('single point of failure') flylead from that/them to the box?

Kind Regards, John
 
Wow, that is a lot.
However ISTR that 60204 tells us that all bonding earths should go to the same point, so why should CPC's not?
 
There just has to be a better way of doing all of that.

Actually I'll go further and say that's disgusting, I predict it's a house basher pretending he can do commercial work.
 
Sponsored Links
There just has to be a better way of doing all of that.

Actually I'll go further and say that's disgusting, I predict it's a house basher pretending he can do commercial work.

A properly sized junction box, din rail, terminals and link bar. Might have cost a bit more in materials but surely quicker to install and a far better and maintainable result.

Why any customer would accept that is beyond me. Their invoice would remain untouched by me until such time as it was done properly.
 
It looks like there is din rail in the back of each box. Could have used some din terminals and links and made th whole thing look decent.
 
There just has to be a better way of doing all of that.
That's probably the first reaction of many/most of us.

However, as I implied, I think that any 'better' ways would probably inevitably reduce the 'directness' of connection of each of the CPCs to the box/banjo, so one might have to question in what sense (other than 'aesthetically') it was 'better', rather than (electrically) 'worse', wouldn't one?

Kind Regards, John
 
That's probably the first reaction of many/most of us.

However, as I implied, I think that any 'better' ways would probably inevitably reduce the 'directness' of connection of each of the CPCs to the box/banjo, so one might have to question in what sense (other than 'aesthetically') it was 'better', rather than (electrically) 'worse', wouldn't one?

Kind Regards, John

Better in that another person can understand and maintain the whole thing.

Not sure of the point of the banjos in a steel box. Just connect all the cpc's to earth terms mounted on the din rail, like gazillions of other industrial installs.
 
That's probably the first reaction of many/most of us.

However, as I implied, I think that any 'better' ways would probably inevitably reduce the 'directness' of connection of each of the CPCs to the box/banjo, so one might have to question in what sense (other than 'aesthetically') it was 'better', rather than (electrically) 'worse', wouldn't one?

Kind Regards, John
Well Personally I'd have popped an earth bar in there, just like used in a CU. One lump of brass, one earth point.
 
Better in that another person can understand and maintain the whole thing.
It's certainly pretty crowded - so that, as a separate and general point, a larger box might have been desirable. However, in terms of the point we're discussing, I can't really see how anyone could fail to understand a pile of G/Ys connected to a the box with a single nut/bolt.
Not sure of the point of the banjos in a steel box.
The banjos are obviously totally redundant, which suggests that the person who installed them had a limited ability to think. However, that doesn't alter the fact that there is an argument for the CPCs all being connected directly to one point on the box, rather than introducing 'unnecessary' joints into them.

Kind Regards, John
 
Well Personally I'd have popped an earth bar in there, just like used in a CU. One lump of brass, one earth point.
Yep, that's another possible approach - but, again, that would introduce 'unnecessary' joints into all the CPCs.

Other than perhaps aesthetically (and the general crowding of the box, which would not be helped by any other handling of the CPC's) what is actually 'wrong' with what has been done?

Kind Regards, John
 
Sounds like another house basher to me
I am certainly not a housebasher, but i use banjos on steel boxes too, I always assumed it increased the brass to steel contact as opposed to not using one, nowadays i use earthing nuts which themselves have a greater brass surface area
 
Yep, that's another possible approach - but, again, that would introduce 'unnecessary' joints into all the CPCs.
I must be missing something, I see it as a reduction of joints and removing the reliance on one nut.

The biggest Risks with a single earth bolt I've found:
1, something being trapped when tightened [like a wire between the layers of lugs] and subsequent work moves the wire but the lose bolt is not discovered.
2, the installer struggles to get his pliers on the nut in amongst the lugs and doesn't tighten it adequatrly.

Other than perhaps aesthetically (and the general crowding of the box, which would not be helped by any other handling of the CPC's) what is actually 'wrong' with what has been done?

Kind Regards, John
Best practice is my answer. However when I posted this:
2018-08-10-23-10-38-jpg.146307

The comments didn't agree when I suggested it would have 'complied' if it was in a box
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top