Morning all (and what a lovely morning!),
we've recently moved into a 60s house - and the back garden is about 80% covered in concrete. Our plan is to lift it all, and eventually get the back area turfed.
This morning I started lifting some bits of concrete - and found something a little unexpected. The top layer - around 2cm thick - is pretty standard looking concrete. But under this is a second layer - around 8-10mm thick - which feels more like some kind of board. It breaks easily but into quite large chunks. Under this is then some general granular material.
What's the middle layer? I'm cautious given the age of the house - and this concrete has probably been there since the 60s - so I'm always aware there might be asbestos kicking around. But any reason this would be used in a garden - I can't imagine so.
I've included a pic of this substrate - you can see it looks pretty much like another layer of concrete - you can see the small bits of aggregate in it.
Any ideas what it might be? It may well be standard for this age and application for all I know.
Many thanks
Keith
we've recently moved into a 60s house - and the back garden is about 80% covered in concrete. Our plan is to lift it all, and eventually get the back area turfed.
This morning I started lifting some bits of concrete - and found something a little unexpected. The top layer - around 2cm thick - is pretty standard looking concrete. But under this is a second layer - around 8-10mm thick - which feels more like some kind of board. It breaks easily but into quite large chunks. Under this is then some general granular material.
What's the middle layer? I'm cautious given the age of the house - and this concrete has probably been there since the 60s - so I'm always aware there might be asbestos kicking around. But any reason this would be used in a garden - I can't imagine so.
I've included a pic of this substrate - you can see it looks pretty much like another layer of concrete - you can see the small bits of aggregate in it.
Any ideas what it might be? It may well be standard for this age and application for all I know.
Many thanks
Keith