Didn't you know?
The g'ment (according to ellal) wish to make big pharma even wealthier, to the detriment of the rest of the population. How this will benefit ANYONE in the end is a mystery.
Perhaps one of the deniers could enlighten us?
'Vaccines' not the 'cure'...
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
- Status
The g'ment (according to ellal) wish to make big pharma even wealthier, to the detriment of the rest of the population. How this will benefit ANYONE in the end is a mystery.
Perhaps one of the deniers could enlighten us?
Sponsored Links
Lol. I advised you to remove it in case of stalkers, you realised the big boo boo you had made, you then squealed like a stuck pig and I get locked out for warning you! Are you saying it was a fake news article about that nice chap JTP then - you did cover up the surname but that didn’t really work. Oh well, you can only help an idiot so far. I tried.
Last edited:
I'm not an 'anti vaxxer', I'm waiting to see if there are long term effects before deciding...
You on the other hand are basing your decision on blind obedience without any real evidence!
Sponsored Links
Not at all...
I'm merely pointing out that the figures regarding the 'virus' may very well be wrong...
But has that changed the 'jab' policy as other countries have started to do?
Nope!
Will you be taking a booster jab?
And any subsequent yearly 'top ups' without questioning the effectiveness/possible harm.
And will you continue to blindly accept government 'death figures' without question?
Edit
Actually I don't...
The boss of Pfizer seems to think that this 'virus' is similar to flu...
Now why would he say that?
Could it possibly be it's just a different strain?
You seem to know exactly what it is, so do enlighten us
Have you set yourself a waiting time?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
If it is the best thing to do.
If it is the best thing to do.
I can't continue doing something that I didn't start doing.
Nope, but will wait for fully independent testing on long term effects before deciding...
Did you know that at one time doctors were used to endorse cigarettes?
Who would have thought at the time that there was a link with lung cancer, but many people bought into the marketing
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
It's absolutely clear what he meant. If you need yearly jab then it is exactly the same as the flu (jab wise), for which you also need a yearly one.
How will you (or notchy
) know what is the 'best thing to do'?Best you (and notchy
) rethink that claim
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
The boss of Pfizer seems to think that this 'virus' is similar to flu...
Now why would he say that?
Could it possibly be it's just a different strain?
You seem to know exactly what it is, so do enlighten us
You referred me to the Lancet the other day as trustworthy....
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30577-4/fulltext
Who is telling you that you 'need' a yearly jab?
Can you tell us what it will contain?
Have you any proof that mRNA vaccines are completely safe long term?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
How will you (or notchy
I'll look at the evidence but can't speak for others.
Best you (and notchy
Don't know what that means.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
No one is. I was responding to a quote that you brought up, not me.
No. Can you tell us what next year's flu jab will contain?
No. I have decided that the benefits far outway the risks though.
How will you (or notchy
I’ll just have to wait and see if I catch it and get ill or suffer any side effects. Unlike you, I put my trust in governments and actually did something. Do you think all governments in the world, including your much loved Iceland, are in it all together? What do they hope to achieve? BTW, the doors are now open.
Last edited:
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Locked
