Building survey fails to mention 'Wall Bracing and Pattress Plates'

elh

Joined
10 Sep 2020
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
This may be the wrong section, or even the wrong forum in which to ask this question. But does anyone have any knowledge if ‘Wall Bracing and Pattress Plates’ should be inspected during a RICs Level 3 Building survey?


I assumed the surveyor would at least comment on or acknowledged their existence as they form part of the structural integrity of the property. However, I can find no mention of this item in any of the current RICs guidance, handbooks or indeed any other document.


I ask because several building surveys I’ve seen fail to mention these supports which I find strange.
 
Sponsored Links
I would expect to see them mentioned as they are a pretty big red flag that there has been some form of structural movement in the past that required remedial work.
 
I would expect to see them mentioned as they are a pretty big red flag that there has been some form of structural movement in the past that required remedial work.

To place them in context, all appear on historic buildings dating to 1800-1840. Many looked to have been fitted around 1900, so well established. But indeed, I'd have thought the same as you, RICs appears to have no stance on the subject.
 
Things only get mentioned if they are relevant or need commenting on i.e. something is wrong with them.

These ties are certainly relevant and if nothing else, should be in the general description of the wall construction.
 
Sponsored Links
‘Wall Bracing and Pattress Plates’ should be inspected

To be honest, I have no idea at all as to how to test these, indeed I cannot recall ever seeing any information on how to test them?

Ken.
 
Can their condition be assessed visually

Agree yes, but? I can see no way of assessing the rod that is attached to the external pattress which could have a load of corrosion at the joint of rod to pattress??

Next problem is what is the rod attached to, if anything.

Ken.
 
They sound a bit like keel bolts in an old yacht. These have no reliable means of inspecting them, so they should be extracted periodically and checked and replaced as necessary
 
Floor joists aren't checked, neither are the lateral restraints to walls off joists. Nor foundations. Nor the internal [load bearing] blockwork or timber frame studs.

The point of a survey is to look for evidence of problems, not take the house apart and inspect every single item.
 
also - doesn't the nature of the survey matter?
Is this a building society survey that basically guarantees they get their money back if you default, or a major survey paid for by the prospective purchaser?
context is important
 
This may be the wrong section, or even the wrong forum in which to ask this question. But does anyone have any knowledge if ‘Wall Bracing and Pattress Plates’ should be inspected during a RICs Level 3 Building survey?
 
I used to do these surveys (or one of the previous versions of them) but stopped because of the prescriptive nature. Everything is tick box now and it's frowned upon to step outside the template. And there was too much passing the buck for my liking. If I record dampness I want to describe it and provide information - not tell them to get a damp survey done!

Anyway, the Home Survey Standard for a level 3 survey says the form of construction and materials used for each part of the building should be described in detail. Tie rods are most certainly a principle feature and should have been noted and described but I would not expect any more than that unless there was an apparent defect present.
 
I used to do these surveys (or one of the previous versions of them) but stopped because of the prescriptive nature. Everything is tick box now and it's frowned upon to step outside the template. And there was too much passing the buck for my liking. If I record dampness I want to describe it and provide information - not tell them to get a damp survey done!

Anyway, the Home Survey Standard for a level 3 survey says the form of construction and materials used for each part of the building should be described in detail. Tie rods are most certainly a principle feature and should have been noted and described but I would not expect any more than that unless there was an apparent defect present.

There are no prescriptive requirements for what you put in a RICS survey, just general guidance, so you can include as much or as little detail as you like. You must have been using one of the generic licenced RICS survey formats, RICS Homebuyers Report or the RICS Home Survey. Dreadful things and no decent Building Surveyor should need to use them. However the numpty general practice surveyors that do most of the residential survey work seem to need the idiot proof multiple choice tick sheets.
 
Many good points made in this thread to reflect upon.

A buildings historian I was speaking with was telling me some of these braces were fitted within years of the building being erected or when they went up in height during modification. Often made from wrought iron by the local blacksmith right up until the 1900s. He like me, found it odd these are not even mentioned within surveys, or to be more precise, there is no guidance saying they should be. He's come across several where the threads have stripped and the wall had moved.

Interesting viewpoint @jeds, and I agree, surveys used to say and mean something (the ones I had done in the distant past did). These days they appear to be get out clauses. Perhaps I'm being unfair in that last sentence.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top