Wayne cousins

I have met her a few times. She was a very friendly person.
Which investigation was that, if you don't mind me asking? Was that the one where she told her officers to nominate her for employee of the month or something like that ?
"In 2016 Sandhu became Borough Commander for Richmond[11] and while an active officer Sandhu achieved a Master’s Degree, Master of Science in International Criminal Justice Studies [12]with Merit. In 2018 Sandhu was appointed Chief Superintendent and was the subject of an investigation which concluded with ‘no case to answer. Sandhu resigned after clearing her name."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parm_Sandhu

Now perhaps you could provide some reliable link to support your derogatory comment about her conduct, if you don't mind me asking.
 
Sponsored Links
"In 2016 Sandhu became Borough Commander for Richmond[11] and while an active officer Sandhu achieved a Master’s Degree, Master of Science in International Criminal Justice Studies [12]with Merit. In 2018 Sandhu was appointed Chief Superintendent and was the subject of an investigation which concluded with ‘no case to answer. Sandhu resigned after clearing her name."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parm_Sandhu

Now perhaps you could provide some reliable link to support your derogatory comment about her conduct, if you don't mind me asking.

Here you go :

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44737810
 
I think it was the same case as the one you mentioned.
The big difference is that I included the verdict of the investigation, which was dismissed as 'no case to answer'.
You conveniently forgot to mention the outcome of the investigation.
You are certainly creating a pattern of presenting false, untrue and misleading comments, and resorting to outlandish lies.
From now on, as far as I am concerned, anything you say will be treated with great suspicion.
You are definitely a person of suspect character.
 
Sponsored Links
Which investigation was that, if you don't mind me asking? Was that the one where she told her officers to nominate her for employee of the month or something like that ?
It was the one where she was found to have done nothing wrong.
 
The big difference is that I included the verdict of the investigation, which was dismissed as 'no case to answer'.
You conveniently forgot to mention the outcome of the investigation.
You are certainly creating a pattern of presenting false, untrue and misleading comments, and resorting to outlandish lies.
From now on, as far as I am concerned, anything you say will be treated with great suspicion.
You are definitely a person of suspect character.

FFS. Did I ask you for the outcome of the investigation? And, you expect me to match your tone and find the outcome of the investigation for the one that I mentioned ?
Both could have been the same investigation as the timeline is very close.
 
FFS. Did I ask you for the outcome of the investigation? And, you expect me to match your tone and find the outcome of the investigation for the one that I mentioned ?
Both could have been the same investigation as the timeline is very close.
The difference was that you described the purpose of the investigation without mentioning the result. That was intentional by you to make a derogatory comment about Parm Sandhu.
You could have easily included the result of the investigation, but there would have been no point in mentioning it then because your point would have had no impact and no purpose. It had no relevance anyway.
Your initial comment was:
Parm Sandhu has left the Met ?
What was the relevance of your comment?
 
The difference was that you described the purpose of the investigation without mentioning the result. That was intentional by you to make a derogatory comment about Parm Sandhu.
You could have easily included the result of the investigation, but there would have been no point in mentioning it then because your point would have had no impact and no purpose. It had no relevance anyway.
Your initial comment was:
Parm Sandhu has left the Met ?
What was the relevance of your comment?

The relevance is I EFFING DID NOT REALIZE THAT SHE HAD LEFT!
She's been on TV a lot recently and it was shown that she was a former ChSupt.
 
The relevance is I EFFING DID NOT REALIZE THAT SHE HAD LEFT!
She's been on TV a lot recently and it was shown that she was a former ChSupt.
So why introduce a totally random comment about what you didn't know into a thread that had nothing to do with Parm Sandhu?
That's bizarre.
 
This is a fairly typical thread for DIYNot General forum. It starts about a Male police officer who abducted raped and killed a woman.

Two pages later its now 'Look a female police officer was investigated for misconduct once.'
 
This is a fairly typical thread for DIYNot General forum. It starts about a Male police officer who abducted raped and killed a woman.

Two pages later its now 'Look a female police officer was investigated for misconduct once.'

Did someone say Brexit?
 
This is a fairly typical thread for DIYNot General forum. It starts about a Male police officer who abducted raped and killed a woman.

Two pages later its now 'Look a female police officer was investigated for misconduct once.'
Misogynists despise being exposed and are extremely uncomfortable dealing with male violence towards women - hence deflectory tactics.
 
Are they upset or are they suggesting that a very vocal lady who's been shamed in the Commons regularly and labels the opposition as vile scum might not be the best person to represent this country on the world stage.

You must have extraordinarily low standards Galahad.

but you applaud Boris who lies and a govt who dishes out billions in bogus contracts.

People who do such things are correctly described as vile scum.

I have to say though, it’s hardly grown up politics from Angela Rayner.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top