What I was saying was some countries still have the majority of their population as the indigenous population - in CZ's case, it happens to be caucasian. They don't suffer through lack of diversity, there are no downsides to lack of diversity (unlike the brainwashing we receive about it being all good and a big benefit) and they have a very settled, largely contented and cohesive population. They all share the same values and traditions, with the benefit that there is no one to be offended or the need for others to be offended on behalf of others.
Unfortunately, despite what our 'leaders' say, mixing cultures and races often causes problems and tensions. In The UK and other countries with high immigrant populations, the incomers form ghettos where violence and crime often proliferates. London is a good exmple, with gangs fighting it out with guns and knives, usually over drugs. These violent gangs are not made up of the indigenous population. Other capitals and provincial cities in former Soviet Bloc countries don't have ghettos, hence there aren't unsafe areas. It has to be said that certain imported cultures are quite industrious and an asset to their host nation. Unfortunately, others are often problematic. This is taken as a whole, though I accept their will be many exceptions either way.
I don't think any level-headed person could argue that the mixing of humans (whether based on race, religion, gender, culture) doesn't have the potential to create challenges. I'd argue it's how those challenges are dealt with by communities and/or countries (including government) that's the most important thing.
I think your view of Soviet Bloc countries is slightly rose-tinted, for example asserting there are no unsafe areas due to no ghettos. We'll probably have to agree to disagree on that one.
I also think people, and this isn't directed at you (general point), are ignorant of history, and by that I don't just mean recent history. Many countries around the world came into being through the migration of groups from one area to another. More recently, let's not get into a debate about how much of the British Empire was founded, although for some reason we're supposed to be given a pass on that in many people's mind.
Also, depending on what someone's personal experience is (whether experienced directly or by a member of their family) I know for sure I'd rather be living in the UK as oppose to many other countries. For example, let's say you have a child that comes out as gay. Good luck with that in many of these countries that seem to be going backwards in their views as oppose to forwards. Of course, some would maybe elect to disown their child for being gay, never to darken their door again, which is a whole other debate.
I also suspect if any people from these countries were offered a good job in a different country that had a mixed population, they would hope to be welcomed, just as they are in the UK (well, in the main.) Strange they don't want to extend the same hand of friendship ... unless you're white and heterosexual.
I'll end with this. Let's say all non-white non-heterosexual non-Christian believing people were wiped off the face of the earth tonight, leaving only white heterosexual Christian people in existence. No doubt utopia for some to imagine. If people are under the illusion there wouldn't still be crimes of all magnitudes, corruption, tyrannical leaders etc, they are living in cloud cuckoo land.
Or would that be more acceptable given none of it was being instigated by brown people?
