- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,359
- Reaction score
- 2,087
- Country
Djokovic
- Thread starter gas112
- Start date
Sponsored Links
So you're a closet fascist then...
What other medical condition are you willing to be forced to share?
And to whom?
You are big on spouting nonsense and then having no way to either justify it or provide the mechanism...
And as I say, you need to spell out the 'consequences' as you see them instead of a 'shrug of the shoulders' reply of 'Dunno, same as any other law breaking I suppose'
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,359
- Reaction score
- 2,087
- Country
No, it started with this,
And I told you how it could be enforced, that's all.
Now you claim I have to spell out the consequences and detail what other medical conditions it could cover. Don't be silly.
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 5,343
- Reaction score
- 598
- Country
I checked my area, on the gov site.
In the last week there was 1 person who died within 28 days of a +ve test. With or without a previous condition - unknown. 95% chance with a previous condition of some sort, which may or may not be relevant.
So what's the chance that a person died OF Omicron?
The numbers are dropping as fast as they did in SA.
It would take a first vaccine a couple of weeks to be effective.
Ask your mates about omicron. I hear a few had it, over in a day or two, a couple said it was like flu.
Omicron, we're told, protects (better than delta).
My personal impression is that it's around a lot.
Government "swabbing" predicts 4.3m, but weak cases don't register +ve.
That's a pretty feeble set of arguments for having a vaccine if you're one of the people who have for whatever reason, mostly selfish, said no up to now. Some small number dying of omicron won't bother them in the slightest.
In the last week there was 1 person who died within 28 days of a +ve test. With or without a previous condition - unknown. 95% chance with a previous condition of some sort, which may or may not be relevant.
So what's the chance that a person died OF Omicron?
The numbers are dropping as fast as they did in SA.
It would take a first vaccine a couple of weeks to be effective.
Ask your mates about omicron. I hear a few had it, over in a day or two, a couple said it was like flu.
Omicron, we're told, protects (better than delta).
My personal impression is that it's around a lot.
Government "swabbing" predicts 4.3m, but weak cases don't register +ve.
That's a pretty feeble set of arguments for having a vaccine if you're one of the people who have for whatever reason, mostly selfish, said no up to now. Some small number dying of omicron won't bother them in the slightest.
Sponsored Links
No you didn't, you prefaced your reply with 'Dunno'
Not silly at all...
If you are prepared to disclose your jab status then you are opening up pandora's box, since once one piece of medical information is out there then what next?
Would you for example wish an insurance company to know your jab status?
Or the results of any tests taken, regardless of the outcome?
I recall reading that some insurance companies years ago refused cover for people who had taken an Aids test...
Not whether they were infected, but just that they were deemed a 'risk' because they had taken a test...
So what do you think happened to the numbers taking tests, and the resultant added spread of the disease?
D
Deleted member 292770
And could also be totally resistant to any chemical you’ve already received.
Deportation?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,359
- Reaction score
- 2,087
- Country
You are making things up again, here is my response regarding how it could be made enforceable,
You came back with further questions which are not relevant to "how it could be made enforceable".
You wouldn't disclose it, your employer would check your status whether you liked it or not. Here is how it will be handled in the NHS,
"Establishing vaccination status
There are a number of ways in which vaccination status can be obtained:
• Staff can be asked directly about their vaccination status.
• Organisations that have undertaken their own vaccination delivery programme can look up which staff have received vaccinations.
• Central databases that record vaccination data from the national vaccination programme can be used and integrated with staff records.
In order to reduce burdens on organisations and staff, a small number of designated members of staff in organisations (e.g. designated individuals in HR & OD teams) can be given access data about staff which has been recorded on the NHS England National Immunisation System (NIMS) database and linked to the NHS Electronic Staff Record (ESR) number. To be clear, the only clinical information that will be made available to NHS organisations from the national immunisation database is an individual’s COVID-19 vaccination status. By getting this information from NHS England’s immunisation database individuals will not need to provide evidence of their vaccination status, making it easier for both them and their managers"
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,359
- Reaction score
- 2,087
- Country
Could be, and is the perfect reason for everyone getting vaccinated to reduce the likelihood of variants emerging.
D
Deleted member 18243
Yes! By rail to some sort of camp do you think?
Stupidity does not make people immune to Covid, despite there being quite a few people on here that believe otherwise
You seem to have a memory problem...
When asked about how it could be enforced...
As for your latest diatribe, you haven't explained how it could actually be enforced, save for vague draconian fascist measures...
Sponsored Links
