Only in Central London would anyone pay £1.5m for one of those houses
Love the way the Metro has pitched it as "Hipsters v. Banker"
And no-one is on "trial", as the article states
The breaching of the boundary was for the greater good in my opinion. I'm sure this pointless dispute will make lawyers that bit richer without anyone actually gaining anything. Utterly pointless dispute.
Can't really blame the architects though. They'll design whatever is within the limitations of planning and to fit the client's brief. Not all architects get to spend all their time working on fancy Grand Designs type projectsHorrific blight. Full width/depth flat roof dormers. What are architects thinking? Where is their pride? I love it when you see a meandering SVP that the architect drew as nice neat lines and an ickle circle. Next we'll be seeing folk build right up to the boundary with hideous lash-ups of flush eaves, troublesome parapets and gutter detail.
FFS.
It doesn’t even mention curry or beer or cake.
Mrs Peck, who runs a gender-neutral children’s clothing business
Under the law yes, you are trespassing if you use someone else's land without reasonable belief that it is OK. Since the neighbour has said its not OK, it is now a trespass.
Does seem funny, although I think that is beside the point. The real point is she didn't think the neighbours contractor wouldbuild anything in her land, and it turns out they did.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local
