No, it's because you have zero evidence for your crackpot ideas.
C'mon, give us your best one, that won't do any harm.
Who said it wasn't ok? Trouble is you have no evidence for any of your claims. If you have I'd really be open to hearing it.
No, I look at the evidence and come to a judgment.
I get the truth from wherever I can. Truth beats lies every time.
I'll take that as a "no".
So does that make the whole thing wrong? Of course it doesn't.
They didn't look very hard, https://www.beiresources.org/BEIHighlights1.aspx?ItemId=79&ModuleId=14004
You can easily prove it wrong then I suppose?
Who knows? Perhaps because he believed it?
Given that we can search historical quotes easily, it would have been stupid of him to say it if he...
Do you think that one advisor really was 70-80% sure? Do you think he was simply wrong or that he was lying?
Good grief, that's what "long" means i.e. you are still affected long after testing positive, completely different "logic".
I don't know enough about the subject unfortunately.
One quote though,
"One might then conclude that even though these processes come under...
Or, one description I've seen, "non-living parasites"....
How can you catch it from the vaccine?
Done a few and it can look quite impressive but very expensive compared with rendered EWI.
It's not a great picture but does this help https://www.showerdoc.com/sirrus-tre-mercati-thermostatic-shower-spares
It looks like the up/down pin...
Are you sure that bit hasn't been left behind i.e. still in the shower valve?
Separate names with a comma.