Police shot to kill Brazilian - now we know.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by oilman, 16 Aug 2005.

  1. pipme

    pipme

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2004
    Messages:
    4,046
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Somerset
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Now, now. No splinter grouping .... Making and breaking alliances etc.
    :mad:
     
  2. Sponsored Links
  3. Freddie

    Freddie

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    2,225
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Very true Oilman i cant resist a naughty dig sometimes but i try not to turn repeatadly entire threads into bickering fights and i dont follow people around the forum posting deliberate negatives to every post some may make which is whats happening at the moment.

    I do have little ding dongs with Kendor which are or where in part tongue in cheek untill you joined in which i believe in your case you started to argue with me on the forum over " paint " and your argument has never stopped even to the point where you think i am in unison with FWL who i dont get on with in other forums.

    I have since tried to avoid your serious posts but you still seem to be one of the few who keep niggling away a certain people of which i am one.
     
  4. david and julie

    david and julie

    Joined:
    9 Apr 2004
    Messages:
    1,752
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Ban-all-sheds wrote.
    I don't recall saying I wasn't.
    Oilman did not say he wanted Slogger to shoot himself. As I read it, he was replying to what could be considered the injustice of some kind of gun law system, I agree with him on this too.
    At this point Slogger hadn't even entered the debate and Oilman was replying to a post from FWL engineer.

    Accidentally when did that get slipped in then? In case you have forgotten this is what you said.
    There is clearly no mention of accidents there. What you would like is crystal clear.

    I do not agree with any kind of violence against anyone, regardless of colour or nationalty.Furthermore, I am not being biased either. As I see it both of you (Ban&Slogger)have advocated violence, so you are little better than each other in this respect. The main difference(to me) being, Slogger appears to let fly, warts and all. Whereas your replies are more considered.( which makes your remark about shooting people even worse)
    You also listed several quotes from Sloggers past posts. There are to many to put on again but you did finish with this.
    No I didn't say you were dragging the forum into the mire, I said this.
    Where have I mentioned you there?

    I don't agree with everything Slogger writes. I also don't agree with the bullying and twisting of post tactics you and your ilk employ either.

    Everything is here for all to read, facts are facts, you were again blatantly offensive and again broke forum rules. You are know trying to justify a situation where you know you are wrong.
     
  5. Big_Spark

    Big_Spark

    Joined:
    20 Feb 2004
    Messages:
    3,434
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    :LOL: :LOL:

    Dave and I don't alweays see eye to eye, and we have certainly had our fair share of run ins, but I must say his post above is one of the best thought out replies I have seen in ages on any forum..

    BAS, conceed defeat fella, it's check mate, he's got you bang to rights.

    Simply accept that on this occasion he is right and you got a bit carried away, as we all do from time to time.

    Now kiss and make up Girls...we have pubs to frequent!! :LOL:
     
  6. JulieL

    JulieL

    Joined:
    14 May 2005
    Messages:
    382
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Fair point Kendor :) ....I do know the score!.....But replying/responding in a similar vain is not the answer is it!? ;)

    It's just (and this is my opinion) I consider whats been going on here, for want of a better word is......bullying! - which I find intolerable (I see this a lot in the NHS.......and hate it!) :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

    I know you (and others) think I defend him but it's not for any other reason other than I feel sorry for him when some people 'gang up' on him and try and ridicule everything he says at every opportunity.

    I actually think he is quite shrewd....and sets us all up for a row! ;)

    I would even 'stick up' for you Kendor, if I thought someone was picking on you.........!
    Blimey...... I really must be going soft!!! ;) :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
     
  7. Moz

    Moz

    Joined:
    19 Jun 2005
    Messages:
    5,132
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Can I just say as I have been off work for a few days , (I got a young 16yo helping the apprentice ,..capitalist ,I know )

    I saw the ITV News breaking their MASSIVE BIG SHOCK HORROR JOUNO WATERGATE EXPOSE ......

    They have got a leaked memo that said the police should of arrested him an not took him out , an the medical stuff was delayed for a week as the police DO NEED SECRACY ....

    they then got this memo off the (lets find a ******* in the woodpile * brigade ,lol)ANTI POLICE WATCHDOG COMISSION ...

    I see a sad dinnertime news show stirring up hate an bile an feeding the muslim hate groups ..for ratings ..

    most of what was made up for the ITV news report has now been rubbished ,
    by the Eyewitness ,who spoke life for the BEEB seconds after he was a foot away ,
    from the tube shooting , live he said the guy DID RUN on the train an the police were screaming for him to POLICE STOP/ARMED POLICE /STOP, they fell on him an shot him dead ...

    no paper was found on the victim ,as ITV news made out he casually got a paper an sautered onto the train an was by dropped an killed ..

    Channel 5 news have found out witnesses were offered MONEY by ITV for a story THEY COULD WORK WITH ..


    to be honest ,
    it was a horrible accident that wouldnt normally happen ...in our society ,

    the family must move on an accept the MASIVELY HUGE PAY OUT they are grasping ..

    that normal honest to goodness legal tax payers in our country didnt get the day the slimey bombers went to London ...

    If the brasilian lot want more money maybe they should talk too OTHER REAL VICTIMS FAMILIES ..1st an see what they have to say ...

    It makes me sick over 2 weeks after a major terrorist attack we have a major TV station ,sinking into the filth of paying people for putting words into their mouths ...

    THAT IS SHAMEFUL,
    than some bloke shot dead by accident ...
    an lets not forget that officer who did kill swarthy illegal charlie ,he has got to live with that ALL HIS LIFE
     
  8. Slogger

    Slogger

    Joined:
    26 Jun 2004
    Messages:
    1,681
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    brazil has some of the worste crimes going for shooting

    they really need to **** off and sort there own country first

    why are some of you vilifying the police for the shooting i dont think they choose to be firearms officers lightly

    heres hoping the islamic supporters decide to march about this i want to see how the police deal with them flag burners as i will be looking out for them in my area if they burn the union jack i will have something to say to them ******* dont matter how many there are we have to make a stand

    come on islam get your boots on its kicking time
     
  9. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds

    Joined:
    27 Aug 2003
    Messages:
    69,782
    Thanks Received:
    2,858
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Somewhat flawed.

    Oh I really think not.....


    I don't recall you saying that you were, and I haven't spotted you expressing any dismay to Slogger about what he says, but I haven't trawled the forum to make sure. Have you told him that what he's written is totally indefensible?

    Whether you have or not is not dreadfully important in it's own right, as clearly it's not feasible to respond to every single post that you don't like in that way. I probably dislike a lot more than you, and I don't do it.

    But I'll tell you what I have seen though - I've seen other people commenting on your support and bias for him.

    You're looking in the wrong place. Try this:

    That is true - I did not say accidentally. I was postulating a scenario where slogger shot himself as a result of being "thick as two short planks", which in my mind implied an accident, or carelessness, but I accept that others may not have made that assumption.

    Now that sounds like you are in favour of capital and/or corporal punishment.
    And unless you've got some desire to go back and revisit all kinds of past decisions, I'd say that as we don't have capital punishment any more you want a referendum because you think that would bring it back.

    So you are (probably) in favour of corporal punishment, you describe yourself as a member of the "hang-em high brigade", you'd like to see capital punishment return, you think that drug dealers, paedophiles and liberals should be shot, but do not agree with any kind of violence against anyone?

    How does that work, then?

    I didn't talk about "shooting people", I said I hoped Slogger would shoot himself. Shooting yourself is not a crime - many of the things that Slogger advocates are crimes. Some of which you would like to see carrying the death penalty...

    Well, the only two people under discussion were me and Slogger. Since not even you would describe him as being liberal and against injustice, that only leaves me.

    But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and ask who you did mean was dragging this forum into the mire. I'll also rephrase this:

    Let's look at some of the things that slogger has recently said, shall we?

    • ***** all illegals ****** them praise our police lets start popping and mopping

      i for one would say shoot them before they get here

      let the lottery sponsor the making of a massive prision ship crewed by our navy and the guards our army no meesing around rough house them into the ship shackles and all and drop them off on there home soil or as near as dammit to it

      we need tough action now asap even if it mean we go out and burn evey last mosk in the uk

      better to be safe than sorry sack the lot of them and stop any more being recruited into any position of power and i mean ANY

      i put it to you that if your an islamic supporter then you cant be a uk citizen

      anyone in the uk supporting this religion is a traitor and shouild be treat as such

      human rights dont belong to criminals sorry but thats it
    So he's advocating discrimination, religious intolerance, cruelty, arson and murder.

    And you say that liberals are dragging this forum into the mire? You have a seriously twisted set of standards.


    Care to respond now?

    Bullying? Where, and how, have I bullied? I'm sure I've said harsh or attacking things in anger, but that is not bullying.

    Twisting of post tactics? What does that mean?

    Oh how true.

    I'm not sure why you are so concerned about that. But if you are concerned about posts which are blatantly offensive, shouldn't you be focusing your attention on the many ones from someone who advocates discrimination, religious intolerance, cruelty, arson and murder, rather than one which expressed the hope that that someone would shoot himself?

    And if you are concerned about breaking forum rules, I would remind you of this:

    And when FWL suggested shooting liberals, you agreed with him.

    I believe the term is hypocrite.

    And that's not abuse - it's a demonstrably true description.

    In the context of what you have written, what you have supported and what you have complained about in a biased and hypocritical way I don't need to justify anything I have said.
     
  10. Sponsored Links
  11. Freddie

    Freddie

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    2,225
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Lets just face it BAS you are right you will always be right about everything and the rest of us just arent worthy of your presence.

    How can we can compete with such a super being

    But its getting very boring now especially as your explanations run into many thousands of words
     
  12. oilman

    oilman

    Joined:
    16 Sep 2003
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Duh, does that mean I've slipped to 2nd place? :cry:
     
  13. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds

    Joined:
    27 Aug 2003
    Messages:
    69,782
    Thanks Received:
    2,858
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Freddie - this place is supposed to be for exchanges of views, discussions, debates, arguments....

    It's not supposed to be a competition.

    But it's also not supposed to be hypocritical complaining about the nature of people's posts....
     
  14. JulieL

    JulieL

    Joined:
    14 May 2005
    Messages:
    382
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    You can't!.........Less is more here I think! ;) :LOL:
     
  15. Freddie

    Freddie

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    2,225
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Well all i can say if you have spend that much time and typing to explain your points or why everybody else is wrong you have already lost your argument
     
  16. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds

    Joined:
    27 Aug 2003
    Messages:
    69,782
    Thanks Received:
    2,858
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I wouldn't expect you to understand.
     
  17. Freddie

    Freddie

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    2,225
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    No i am just riff raff common guttersnipe illiterate thicko secondary school muppet, where you are---------------------------------- :eek: ?????????????????????? talking down to me again :)
     
Loading...

Share This Page