1. Visiting from the US? Why not try DIYnot.US instead? Click here to continue to DIYnot.US.
    Dismiss Notice

Schneider Electric 17th edition quiz

Discussion in 'Electrics UK' started by GaryMo, 21 Jun 2008.

  1. GaryMo

    GaryMo

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2007
    Messages:
    4,134
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Manchester
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  2. Sponsored Links
  3. SparkyMarky

    SparkyMarky

    Joined:
    4 May 2006
    Messages:
    135
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Oh dear. That wasn't pretty :cry:

    Mind you, unless you know the 17th inside out (or have a copy in front of you at the time) it's a pretty tough test...
     
  4. securespark

    securespark

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2004
    Messages:
    36,882
    Thanks Received:
    1,269
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    :LOL:

    Easy-peasy!

    WITHOUT the book (it was in the van & I couldn't be bothered to go and get it), I thought I'd have a go just to see what I'd get.

    32/33. One question tripped me up & it was worded so badly, it didn't even make sense. See below...

    Just like the one question that tripped me up in the C&G 17th update exam... :cry:


    That question was:

    In metallic construction with regards to the depth of cable, what are RCD's required for?

    a. Lighting only.

    b. Sockets only.

    c. RCD required for everything irrespective of depth.

    d. RCD's are not required.


    That to me is confusing. Anyone else agree?
     
  5. 333rocky333

    333rocky333

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2008
    Messages:
    8,382
    Thanks Received:
    894
    Location:
    Essex
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    only got 18 without the book :oops:
     
  6. Taylortwocities

    Taylortwocities

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2006
    Messages:
    20,431
    Thanks Received:
    2,113
    Location:
    Oxfordshire
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    24 without the book. Makes it hard to get the regs questions right where you have to quote the exact reg number.

    I agree SS - that question could have been written by C&G!
     
  7. jockspark

    jockspark

    Joined:
    13 Mar 2008
    Messages:
    299
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    yes the answer is c but took me a bit of time to understand the question
     
  8. 333rocky333

    333rocky333

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2008
    Messages:
    8,382
    Thanks Received:
    894
    Location:
    Essex
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I would have said D
     
  9. SparkyMarky

    SparkyMarky

    Joined:
    4 May 2006
    Messages:
    135
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I said D as well. I'm still not sure I really understand what they were geting at with that question. I managed 23 without the book though...
     
  10. Sponsored Links
  11. securespark

    securespark

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2004
    Messages:
    36,882
    Thanks Received:
    1,269
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I said D too. I thought what it was getting at was that if you have earthed metallic covering, you don't need RCD's.

    jock- OOI, how did you interpret the question?
     
  12. RF Lighting

    RF Lighting

    Joined:
    31 Mar 2006
    Messages:
    19,990
    Thanks Received:
    1,354
    Location:
    Leeds
    Country:
    United Kingdom

    Perhaps as well I'm off on the three day course next week :LOL:

    (That was without the book)

    Simon, got that question in the online test. I got it wrong, but having sat and studied it, and seen the correct answer, and bearing in mind the changes from the 16th edition, I think this is how it should have been written:

    In a studwork wall of metallic construction, with regards to the depth of cable, what are RCD's required for?
     
  13. securespark

    securespark

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2004
    Messages:
    36,882
    Thanks Received:
    1,269
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Gotcha.

    So, does poor grammar by Schneider mean that I have got full marks? ;)

    I made an official complaint to C & G about the awkward wording of some of the questions I got on my 17th update exam.

    Had a verbal reply telling me they are all vetted to "make sure they are easy to understand".

    Will write and see what their written response is.
     
  14. RF Lighting

    RF Lighting

    Joined:
    31 Mar 2006
    Messages:
    19,990
    Thanks Received:
    1,354
    Location:
    Leeds
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    The "correct" answer is still wrong though AFAIK.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but an RCD is not required for wiring in a metallic stud wall if the cable is SWA for example.

    There were a couple of questions on that test which depending on the installation circumstances, all four answers could be wrong. :rolleyes:
     
  15. securespark

    securespark

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2004
    Messages:
    36,882
    Thanks Received:
    1,269
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Yeah, know what you mean.

    In my C&G exam, I'm sure one of the questions had a double negative. :confused:
     
  16. RF Lighting

    RF Lighting

    Joined:
    31 Mar 2006
    Messages:
    19,990
    Thanks Received:
    1,354
    Location:
    Leeds
    Country:
    United Kingdom

    e) An RCD is not required if earthed metallic conduit is used, as per regulation 522.6.6(ii)


    c) It depends wether the lighting circuit supplies a light in a location containing a bath or shower.


    Got to be answer d)
    At least they have a sense of humour :)


    Well I've cancelled my course next week, because I now know it all :LOL:

    Does anyone know if you allowed to take your regs into the exam?
     
  17. Taylortwocities

    Taylortwocities

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2006
    Messages:
    20,431
    Thanks Received:
    2,113
    Location:
    Oxfordshire
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Sure you can, its open book same as 2381.
     
Loading...

Share This Page