- Joined
- 23 May 2022
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
-
My neighbours built a home office in the garden of their mid-terrace flat during lockdown, and they are in it most of the time. We are in a conservation area with article 4 directions. The previous neighbours hardly used their garden and I'm now constantly under-looked when I'm in my most-used rooms which were previously private. I know these are not really valid grounds for a complaint.
But, I've spoken informally to a couple of people who told me that the construction of the garden office should have had planning permission. This was the person who answered when I rang up the council's general planning line (though this wasn't a planning officer), and someone from the local area conservation society. Yet no application was made.
What strikes me as curious is that the upper floors of the house are a council flat occupied by council tenants. I feel that the family who live there are discouraged from accessing the rear of the garden (their section), because they would have to go down the garden path that's at the side of the home office, and past the leaseholder's large aggressive dog too. I would have thought that as the council are the freeholder, they would have stuck up for the interests of their tenant and refused permission. Or anyway they would have known that it was necessary to apply for planning permission and they would have done so.
I don't think the leaseholders are in the wrong, they must surely have obtained permission from the freeholder. But was the local council freeholder in error not to then apply for planning permission?
What would happen if I chose to meddle and wrote a letter to the planning department identifying the issue? I suppose they would just be made to retrospectively apply for planning permission, they wouldn't be made to knock it down?
By the way I am a long-term tenant. I have mentioned it to my landlord who's the freeholder of this property, but he is not bothered.
But, I've spoken informally to a couple of people who told me that the construction of the garden office should have had planning permission. This was the person who answered when I rang up the council's general planning line (though this wasn't a planning officer), and someone from the local area conservation society. Yet no application was made.
What strikes me as curious is that the upper floors of the house are a council flat occupied by council tenants. I feel that the family who live there are discouraged from accessing the rear of the garden (their section), because they would have to go down the garden path that's at the side of the home office, and past the leaseholder's large aggressive dog too. I would have thought that as the council are the freeholder, they would have stuck up for the interests of their tenant and refused permission. Or anyway they would have known that it was necessary to apply for planning permission and they would have done so.
I don't think the leaseholders are in the wrong, they must surely have obtained permission from the freeholder. But was the local council freeholder in error not to then apply for planning permission?
What would happen if I chose to meddle and wrote a letter to the planning department identifying the issue? I suppose they would just be made to retrospectively apply for planning permission, they wouldn't be made to knock it down?
By the way I am a long-term tenant. I have mentioned it to my landlord who's the freeholder of this property, but he is not bothered.