- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,845
- Reaction score
- 3,514
- Country

Dunno what happened to that thread there fellas.
Don't spoil it....
I was going to say that lots of sparks were working to old regs because, well...at one point they could!
Joking aside, when I first started dipping my toe in the industry in 1983, the 15th (released- in print anyway- 2 years prior) had been worrying the industry as it was so vastly different to its predecessor. It was decided to delay the full introduction of the 15th until 1 January 1985 as many voices fears they could not understand the new layout, based on the IEC regs.
That is why v.o. ELCBs were deleted from the regs from that date. Signalling the end of the 14th and the start "proper" of the 15th.
I think also that there were issues fitting in the IECs strict voltage requirements.
Don't spoil it....
I was going to say that lots of sparks were working to old regs because, well...at one point they could!
Joking aside, when I first started dipping my toe in the industry in 1983, the 15th (released- in print anyway- 2 years prior) had been worrying the industry as it was so vastly different to its predecessor. It was decided to delay the full introduction of the 15th until 1 January 1985 as many voices fears they could not understand the new layout, based on the IEC regs.
That is why v.o. ELCBs were deleted from the regs from that date. Signalling the end of the 14th and the start "proper" of the 15th.
I think also that there were issues fitting in the IECs strict voltage requirements.
