1. Visiting from the US? Why not try DIYnot.US instead? Click here to continue to DIYnot.US.
    Dismiss Notice

yes or no ?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by markie, 28 Dec 2006.

  1. markie

    markie

    Joined:
    2 Dec 2005
    Messages:
    3,181
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  2. Sponsored Links
  3. JohnD

    JohnD

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2005
    Messages:
    74,223
    Thanks Received:
    4,285
    Location:
    Crossgates, Europe
    Country:
    Cook Islands
    If for a moment we disregard the age of the foolish boys, and our pity for the family of the dead one, consider that an innocent person has suffered severe injury due to the deliberate act of another.

    Perhaps we should compare this to a lorry driver who suffers equally severe injuries as a result of foolish boys dropping a lump of concrete off a motorway bridge. He certainly deserves some kind of compensation, although it would be preferable to receive it from the person responsible for the injury. In some cases, such as the unemployed or career criminals, or youngsters, or people who run off and are not caught, they cannot be made to pay.
     
  4. Softus

    Softus

    Joined:
    21 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    19,558
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I don't have any problem with it - good luck to him.
     
  5. swelec

    swelec

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  6. Gary_M

    Gary_M

    Joined:
    1 Feb 2006
    Messages:
    1,138
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Moray
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    It seems fair that he gets compensation for something deliberately caused by another party. However, if the law says that a 'dead person cannot be sued', then I can't see how the case will go anywhere :confused:
     
  7. JohnD

    JohnD

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2005
    Messages:
    74,223
    Thanks Received:
    4,285
    Location:
    Crossgates, Europe
    Country:
    Cook Islands
    Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (=you and me the taxpayer).

    My old mum got a couple of thousand a few years back when two lads pushed her to the ground, snatched her handbag and drove off in the car she was about to get into :(
     
  8. markie

    markie

    Joined:
    2 Dec 2005
    Messages:
    3,181
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I remember a few years ago, I was involved in minor fight ( self defence ) I hit the guy once then walked away, but the next day C.I.D. came knocking on the door :eek: took me away etc... Anyway I was fined £140 :mad: they said for G.B.H. the other guy got £640 compen from the CICB :mad: he told them he didn't have full vision in his left eye. :confused: considering I hit him near his jaw. Seen the guy a few weeks later and he was bouncing a golf ball, walking down the street.
     
  9. Softus

    Softus

    Joined:
    21 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    19,558
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Sounds like a regular Sunday Mass in Noocassle. ;)
     
  10. Sponsored Links
  11. markie

    markie

    Joined:
    2 Dec 2005
    Messages:
    3,181
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    It might be worse now, it was 15 years ago when I had my fight. :LOL:
     
  12. Zampa

    Zampa

    Joined:
    14 Mar 2005
    Messages:
    5,778
    Thanks Received:
    30
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Terrible that a lad got killed..'boys will be boys' etc...but losing at playing chicken?...well an awful sacrifice.

    However..if that was an adult, lashed up and deliberatly causing mayhem then people may not feel the same sympathy

    What m trying to say is you cannot let the fact that it was a kid distort the fact that the guy was seriiously injured through no fault of he own..

    He deserves a few quid surely
     
  13. ETHunter

    ETHunter

    Joined:
    21 Dec 2006
    Messages:
    29
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Essex
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I find myself in total agreement with the views expressed by everyone else. The man on the motorcycle did nothing wrong, and has had his life violently interupted for no good reason, of course he should, as a minimum, be able to recieve compensation that would cover his lost earnings, posible ongoing medical expenses, replacement of his motorcycle or repairs to it and for the trauma of the event. This should be treated as any other traffic incident.
     
  14. Softus

    Softus

    Joined:
    21 Oct 2004
    Messages:
    19,558
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Surely not as any other traffic incident. ;)

    Hey! I've got an idea - you could contact him and offer the services of your wife, her father and her grandfather. Problem solved. :D
     
  15. Igorian

    Igorian

    Joined:
    30 Mar 2004
    Messages:
    2,736
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    Northamptonshire
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    You'll get moderated. Mine just got deleted. :cry:
     
  16. empip

    empip

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2005
    Messages:
    6,314
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    That is £137.255 Billion or £15.67 million per hour 24/7 for the year 2003.

    Total take is around £550 billion I believe (a mere £17,440 per sec 24/7)... There must be far heavier spends than society taking care of the innocent.
    As an Oz cricket observer has recently written, "we achieve much more with far less resources than England..." Probably true throughout.
    Keep an eye on what may be happening http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/news/blog.php No smoke without.. etc.
    :D :D
     
  17. securespark

    securespark

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2004
    Messages:
    37,139
    Thanks Received:
    1,288
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Yes, I would say so.

    If the biker was at fault, the boy's relatives would be holding him responsible for the death and claiming from the biker's insurance company, wouldn't they?

    At 12, a child knows (or should know) the risks of crossing a road, and should do so safely. The fact he was playing chicken means he knew he was taking a huge risk, and therefore was not exercising care in crossing the road.
     

Share This Page