Standard practice.
Turn a blind eye and let nature take its course.
In every civilian population there are evil people, normally they are controlled,when society is under stress, the scum starts to rise.
Israel did the same in Lebanon.
Zion and the Art of Armageddon
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
- Status
Turn a blind eye and let nature take its course.
In every civilian population there are evil people, normally they are controlled,when society is under stress, the scum starts to rise.
Israel did the same in Lebanon.
A pleasant change of pace to see a ceasefire in Lebanon...but since the war in Gaza continues - and looks like it will continue into the New Year - the State of Israel carries on a policy of expansion unhindered by Western media. Not many news agencies in Israel are prepared to shine a light on their government's policies, either, although Haaretz is a shining example of the Democratic right to tell truth to power.
An op-ed in the Guardian by the editor-in-chief, Aluf Benn, is well worth a read, partly to explain how growing censorship throughout the world tries to hide these increasingly repressive right-wing governments...and partly as a rebuttal to the ridiculous accusations of anti-semitism and racism in this forum.
Almost always alone, Haaretz has been reporting for decades on the suffering of Palestinians under Israeli occupation and on what the IDF considers the “collateral damage” of fighting terrorism. Time and again, the newspaper has been castigated for criticising the morality of IDF actions. Readers have cancelled their subscriptions, and politicians rallied against us. But we never budged. When you see war crimes, you must speak out while the war is raging, rather than wait until it’s too late to make a difference. The 7 October war is no different: alone again, we report on the other side of the conflict, despite the difficulty of accessing sources in Gaza or Lebanon, while also embedding our reporters with the IDF like other media.
Netanyahu has never liked our critical stance towards him and his policy of occupation and annexation, calling Haaretz and the New York Times “the greatest enemies of Israel” in 2012 (though he later denied it ). Having built his career on media manipulation, Netanyahu can’t stand independent, critical voices. In the previous decade, his abuse of state power to twist media coverage, exposed by Haaretz in 2015, led Netanyahu to the dock in a still-pending criminal corruption trial. But even after his indictment, he only changed the tactics, not the strategy, borrowing from the successful playbook of his Hungarian friend and mentor Viktor Orbán: attack the mainstream media as hostile, have your billionaire supporters launch supportive channels, build a “poison machine” to unite your base across social networks. Over time, the mainstream would shift its stance, adding the leader’s mouthpieces to primetime panels, fearing the loss of viewers to the no-holds-barred Channel 14, Israel’s Fox-on-steroids.
Netanyahu's boycott of Haaretz - passed unanimously in the Knesset - will not prevent them revealing the truth about this extremist regime, and ensuring, in time, justice will prevail.
An op-ed in the Guardian by the editor-in-chief, Aluf Benn, is well worth a read, partly to explain how growing censorship throughout the world tries to hide these increasingly repressive right-wing governments...and partly as a rebuttal to the ridiculous accusations of anti-semitism and racism in this forum.
Almost always alone, Haaretz has been reporting for decades on the suffering of Palestinians under Israeli occupation and on what the IDF considers the “collateral damage” of fighting terrorism. Time and again, the newspaper has been castigated for criticising the morality of IDF actions. Readers have cancelled their subscriptions, and politicians rallied against us. But we never budged. When you see war crimes, you must speak out while the war is raging, rather than wait until it’s too late to make a difference. The 7 October war is no different: alone again, we report on the other side of the conflict, despite the difficulty of accessing sources in Gaza or Lebanon, while also embedding our reporters with the IDF like other media.
Netanyahu has never liked our critical stance towards him and his policy of occupation and annexation, calling Haaretz and the New York Times “the greatest enemies of Israel” in 2012 (though he later denied it ). Having built his career on media manipulation, Netanyahu can’t stand independent, critical voices. In the previous decade, his abuse of state power to twist media coverage, exposed by Haaretz in 2015, led Netanyahu to the dock in a still-pending criminal corruption trial. But even after his indictment, he only changed the tactics, not the strategy, borrowing from the successful playbook of his Hungarian friend and mentor Viktor Orbán: attack the mainstream media as hostile, have your billionaire supporters launch supportive channels, build a “poison machine” to unite your base across social networks. Over time, the mainstream would shift its stance, adding the leader’s mouthpieces to primetime panels, fearing the loss of viewers to the no-holds-barred Channel 14, Israel’s Fox-on-steroids.
Netanyahu's boycott of Haaretz - passed unanimously in the Knesset - will not prevent them revealing the truth about this extremist regime, and ensuring, in time, justice will prevail.
Nice of the israelis to murder more civilians in Beirut in their biggest air strike yet hours before they knew the ceasefire would come into effect...
Just to make a point that they will go ahead with whatever they want to do at any time!
Just to make a point that they will go ahead with whatever they want to do at any time!
Dare say the mad mullers in Tehran are seething
The amount of damage that has been inflicted on there terrorist proxy’s
Seems like ( ?) the hamas terrorist organisation in Gaza have been abandoned by there Islamic brothers
The amount of damage that has been inflicted on there terrorist proxy’s
Seems like ( ?) the hamas terrorist organisation in Gaza have been abandoned by there Islamic brothers
And step by step the land grab/'general's plan' continues...
Israel building new military dividing line across Gaza
“They’re digging in for the long term. I would absolutely expect the north partition to develop exactly like the Netzarim Corridor.”
"The BBC has previously documented how two partitions have been constructed in Gaza since the start of the current war. The Netzarim Corridor splits an area south of Gaza City, while the Philadelphi Corridor gives the IDF control of land running the length of Gaza’s border with Egypt"
The zionists won't be satisfied until they have taken all Palestinian land...
From the river (and beyond) to the sea is their goal !
And no doubt the usual suspects (who are too ignorant to understand ironic posts) will be celebrating at this news
Israel building new military dividing line across Gaza
“They’re digging in for the long term. I would absolutely expect the north partition to develop exactly like the Netzarim Corridor.”
"The BBC has previously documented how two partitions have been constructed in Gaza since the start of the current war. The Netzarim Corridor splits an area south of Gaza City, while the Philadelphi Corridor gives the IDF control of land running the length of Gaza’s border with Egypt"
The zionists won't be satisfied until they have taken all Palestinian land...
From the river (and beyond) to the sea is their goal !
And no doubt the usual suspects (who are too ignorant to understand ironic posts) will be celebrating at this news
Israel's genocide and ethnic cleansing has been continuing for over 70 years. It started long before last September.
Seizure of Palestinian land has never stopped.
Not a lot by the looks of it and the situation they are in
Hamas don’t give a stuff about there own civilian casualties
The more the better for there propaganda
Most if not all the leadership are in first class hotels abroad
Using there Geneva bank accounts which contains billions given to them in aid by the international community that they stole
Bunch of crooks / gangsters and fruit cakes
But you mentioned a calculation.
What is the calculation you had created in your head?
I reckon they 'calculated' that their muslim 'brothers' would immediately come to their aid and attack Israel big time.
Of course, that didn't happen.
Have any of their muslim neighbours allowed Palestinian civilians to flee the war by giving them sanctuary in their countries? I might be wrong but I don't think so.
I've seen some written opinions saying that it's because they think the Palestinians are more trouble than they're worth!
Are you transam?
That all you got?
- Status