Search results

Part (a) included all the above, including (e) which specifically stated that there is nothing which makes the location of siting of the building unpractical of undesirable. On part (b) they revisited this and back tracked stating that the livestock building is an issue.

Hi Woody and Nakajo, thank you for your responses. The livestock barn was identified on the location plan and clearly marked. The Planning statement went into detail about the livestock building and how many cattle it contained within the part a submission (which was granted) so based on your...

Hi Woody thanks for the reply, are you familiar with Class Q agricultural to residential regulations? The reason for refusal should have been identified at Class Q (a) stage.

Hello, We recently applied for permitted development change of use of agricultural building to residential and this was granted under class Q (a). We thought great! Had detailed plans / elevations drawn up for the second part, class Q (b) however this was refused due to the proximity of a...