Now I know this is a somewhat vague question.
I know for example PD rights are thrown out of the window and now everything requires full PP but just how much more difficult is it to get that PP?
For example I have an Edwardian semi that has about 11ft all the way down the side. At present it has a non original dilapidated garage on it.
My plan was to knock it down and build a ground floor extension that starts 1.7m staggered back from the front of the house. There will be a part first floor element and this would be staggered back 7.5m from the front of house.
It would run down the entire side of my property so about 50ft and I would be leaving one meter side access.
I am miles clear of all 45 degree sunlight angles.
All tiles, render would be matched to existing.
There would be no flat roofs.
Would this sort of proposal be immediately rejected in a CA just because it would change the way the property looked?
Thanks
I know for example PD rights are thrown out of the window and now everything requires full PP but just how much more difficult is it to get that PP?
For example I have an Edwardian semi that has about 11ft all the way down the side. At present it has a non original dilapidated garage on it.
My plan was to knock it down and build a ground floor extension that starts 1.7m staggered back from the front of the house. There will be a part first floor element and this would be staggered back 7.5m from the front of house.
It would run down the entire side of my property so about 50ft and I would be leaving one meter side access.
I am miles clear of all 45 degree sunlight angles.
All tiles, render would be matched to existing.
There would be no flat roofs.
Would this sort of proposal be immediately rejected in a CA just because it would change the way the property looked?
Thanks