Isn't this (because the child goes to the carer; not the carer comes to the child) like paying a months rent in advance and then deciding not to live there for that month?
Well we haven't decided not to live there for the month. The government have told us we can't.
I was happy to pay her, until she told us she will no longer be looking after our child.
If she had waited a further 2 weeks then advised us I wouldn't have a problem.
But even as far as Thursday evening she was asking us if we had changed our minds to out our son in nursery from September.
I'm going to have to digress a bit here. Back in January she advised she will no longer be doing the government funded hours which we had planned to do with her aswell as too up the difference so she wasn't out of pocket. Our child is not eligible for this until September however at the time she thought we were eligible from the Easter term. And so this forced our hand to find alternative arrangements which we did we found an amazing place, we did ask her for a meeting so we could discuss an option of her still to look after our son, but excuses were always made and the meeting was never had. She also told us that this year she was taking 6 weeks holiday the day before the new year caring year started (she runs her year Jan to Jan, we were told the day before son was due to return)
Right back on point. She was still pestering us to continue looking after our son as she has now changed her mind and will now accept the funded hours. We told her Thursday that we had already chosen a placement and paid the deposit and sorted paperwork, and we didn't want the hassle of using multiple carers.
We paid her a month's money on Tuesday, she comes to our door Friday night handing this letter to us advising termination.
Conveniently the termination offer she's written 6 weeks but it's actually 5 , and covers the money we would be owed if she terminated straight away.
When I spoke to her today her decision was apparently made 2 weeks ago, she was just waiting for the ducks to align as her husband put it.
This smacks to me as completely dishonest and the reason she didn't say anything sooner was so she could get an extra months money.
Had she waited another 2 weeks I wouldn't have batted an eye lid.
She did look after her best friends children and then the government ruling can out and she asked her for only half fees to keep the child places, her friend refused. We know this as the child minder told my wife. We tried to do the right thing and have been stung because of it.