The connection to the channel tunnel . . . . Duh.Does everybody know what HS1 was
You've previously posted though, that the country has no money.
If we don't have money for essential or humanitarian spending, why should we find borrow some for vanities?
Also, as is the case with most UK capital "grand" projects, it is colossally overspent already, set to massively under-deliver; a vehicle to pour yet more public funds into chums' pockets.
The cost-benefit-analysis was, IIRC, fiddled, to make the project appear beneficial: something about business travellers stare out of the window for their usual journey (rather than work on their laptops), thus making the extra 15 minutes in the office a new gain, rather than just stealing that time from the slower journey.............
Finally, the environmental and social impact of Crystal Palace and St Pauls (your examples) is limited; HS2 has already seen thousands of homes compulsorily-purchased and razed, now for nothing, not to mention the woodlands and habitats that are now gone.
I attend regular meetings - with colleagues from all over the UK - in London already.
Why London?
Because it is already easy to get to, from anywhere.
All HS2 does is reinforces this - and further enables the concentration of wealth in the South-East - rather than making Liverpool to Leeds, or Newcastle to Manchester, easier and faster.
While "London" complains that it is overcrowded already, gridlocked..........so the "solution" is to grease even more people into there.......
The whole country gets saddled with more debt, for decades to come, to oil the path for London even more. With a few crumbs tossed to a very limited number of places, as a sop.
the funny thing is the name HS2 has been around for years but it had never occurred to me to wonder what HS1 was - I don’t remember it being called that the time.The connection to the channel tunnel . . . . Duh.
Wasn't it the Great War?the funny thing is the name HS2 has been around for years but it had never occurred to me to wonder what HS1 was - I don’t remember it being called that the time.
Im now wondering if world war 1 was called that until after WW2……
That seems like an oxymoronWasn't it the Great War?
Me & SWMBO likes our road trips & booking cottages or B&B's around the country so's we can wander & explore.
We have a particular fondness for Edinburgh & especially the Tattoo, but driving / riding there is a pain unless we include it in a 3-4-5 day road trip. What we want is someway to get there & back preferably in one day but I s'pose 2 days will do. Now you'd think that this has 'let the train take the strain' written all over it & we did try it once. NEVER EVER AGAIN.
Great as in pan-european or scale of conflict.That seems like an oxymoron
I had reason to go to Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Clearly quicker to fly (even accounting for drive to BHX, check-in etc)..............but also cheaper. Quite a bit cheaper.
When you factor in that "time is money", it was ridiculously cheap to fly, compared to take the train.
A Cameron vanity project, what is it with certain politicians and the need to leave some lasting physical legacy. An upgraded Leeds to Manchester railway would be more help to the northI regularly drive past the scorched-earth-and-concrete outside of Lichfield.
If they pull the plug on the Northern section, that lot will be reclaimed by nature within five years.
Billions wasted.
Not that I didn't think the whole thing was a vanity project to start with.