On ignore

  • Thread starter Deleted member 294929
  • Start date
Sponsored Links
Then why are you talking about Brexit?
I’m not

Bod put me on ignore because he couldn’t handle his silly nonsense about George Floyd being challenged.

I didn’t start comments about Brexit on this thread - I responded to Bod
 
excuses excuses excuses

you lost the argument on the George Floyd thread and you had a hissy fit.

you were the one that kept repeating the claim “he wasn’t a bent copper” - being bent had nothing whatsoever to do him being violent.
Being impartial here, but "bent" means "corrupt", not "violent".
That's what @Bod ... was trying to make you understand.
You used the wrong word.
 
I’m not

Bod put me on ignore because he couldn’t handle his silly nonsense about George Floyd being challenged.

I didn’t start comments about Brexit on this thread - I responded to Bod
You are. Your post that I quoted was your reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

IMG_5902.jpeg


If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?
 
Sponsored Links
Your post that I quoted was in reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?

View attachment 326586
But two wrongens make a left.
 
Being impartial here, but "bent" means "corrupt", not "violent".
That's what @Bod ... was trying to make you understand.
You used the wrong word.
exactly: Bod was the one using the wrong word

he kept saying Derek Chauvin wasn’t “bent” - which has nothing to do with the case.
 
So is Notchy in the wrong and Bod couldn’t be arsed arguing with a child again ?
No

Bod is in the wrong.

Bod tried dishonestly claiming he had not seen anything that showed Derek Chauvin was “bent” ……which has FA to do with it

Chauvin had many previous complaints against him for being violent - so why was Bod trying to talk about him “not being bent”
 
So is Notchy in the wrong and Bod couldn’t be arsed arguing with a child again ?
I don't mind Notch but I believe him to be a Russian antagonist, and there is only so much
"He's behind you's" ''Oh no he's not's"
I can take
 
You are. Your post that I quoted was your reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

View attachment 326586

If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?
You can always tell when you’ve caught Notch out as he goes all quiet on the subject and stops replying to you. Like that time he made up lies about me saying that "all black families are thieves" but wouldn’t show me where I was supposed to have said it.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top