Another power grab

[Odds]

Governments be warned: You must protect your citizens from climate change — it’s their human right.

The prescient message was laced throughout a dense ruling Tuesday from Europe’s top human rights court. The court’s conclusion? Humans have a right to safety from climate catastrophes that is rooted in their right to life, privacy and family. The definition-shifting decision from the European Court of Human Rights means nearly 50 governments representing almost 700 million people will now have to contend with a new era of litigation from climate-stricken communities alleging inaction.

Politico.uk

Poor old Spode confuses the 'will of the people' with the people's Human Rights.
Too much GBnews has rotted away his faculties.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

No they are taking it as easy as they can trying not to get too hot unlike in the winter trying desperately not to die from hyperthermia whilst trying to keep warm huddled up next to a 1 bar heater dreading the next electric bill fearing to venture out lest they slip on frost or ice and break their hip.

So neither extreme is good for them?

 

[aveatry]

So neither extreme is good for them?

Cold has worse outcomes for them - its a fact

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Cold has worse outcomes for them - its a fact

As I said before then. You haven't had much dealings with older folk, women especially. And middle aged women too.

 

[aveatry]

As I said before then. You haven't had much dealings with older folk, women especially. And middle aged women too.

Why cant you just accept the fact cold is worse for the elderly than heat - then we can move on.

 

[gant]

Governments be warned: You must protect your citizens from climate change — it’s their human right.

The prescient message was laced throughout a dense ruling Tuesday from Europe’s top human rights court. The court’s conclusion? Humans have a right to safety from climate catastrophes that is rooted in their right to life, privacy and family. The definition-shifting decision from the European Court of Human Rights means nearly 50 governments representing almost 700 million people will now have to contend with a new era of litigation from climate-stricken communities alleging inaction.

Politico.uk

Poor old Spode confuses the 'will of the people' with the people's Human Rights.
Too much GBnews has rotted away his faculties.

Poor odds you was going so well to you started to get giddy.
What about the human rights of people who don't believe the climate change hoax or to a lesser degree how it's being administered to prevent climate change. This ruling means they can't be represented by a political party even though they've won by a majority.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Why cant you just accept the fact cold is worse for the elderly than heat - then we can move on.

Because I dont agree with your claim.

It isn't as simple as you seem to think it is. That's normal though

 

[aveatry]

Because I dont agree with your claim.

It is not a claim it is a fact.

 

[Notch7]

What about the human rights of people who don't believe the climate change hoax

The human rights of stupid people don’t count.

 

[denso13]

This ruling means they can't be represented by a political party even though they've won by a majority.

Nonsense. You're just making stuff up...

 

[aveatry]

The human rights of stupid people don’t count.

A little man with a funny moustache thought exactly the same as you in the 1940s

 

[noseall]

Cold has worse outcomes for them - its a fact

It is?

In extremes of temperature, it's easier for a human (with zero outside means of control) to try and warm up than it is for a human to try and cool down.

 

[aveatry]

It is?

Yes - not my theory but Gov facts.

 

[transam]

Well they reckon (?) Austria will be ice free in 70 years

That could be an advantage ?

Same with Greenland there ice watsit is retreating

Very good news if you are a Greenlander

 

[noseall]

Yes - not my theory but Gov facts.

Post them up then, please.