Would any of those posters who are unable to both spell correctly and successfully use the forum quoting feature please explain what qualifies them to criticise the reasoning of a High Court judge?
Then why don't you just explain why your opinion is a more informed one that that of a judge?We are all allowed opinions regardless of our spelling failings and/or lack of computer skills.
No, I'm suggesting that you can't explain why your opinion is a more informed one that that of a judge.Are you putting forward a theory that in order to have a say in what goes on we should pass a spelling test.
Oh, OK. My mistake.I didn't say my opinion was more informed than a high court judge
And you did that without me using either of the words "allowed" and "opinion", and without me using any other word that remotely resembles the words "allowed" or "opinion".I merely stated that you seem to discriminate who is allowed to have an opinion by how well they can command the written word.
Thanks. I'd scrounge one off you, but clearly you've run out.You need to take a chill pill.
In that case I have no idea why you've been responding to what I posted about the people who do do those things.I haven't, as far as I am aware, criticised any high court judge.
I may have made a spelling mistake on the odd occassion but no real howlers.
I don't think I have made any errors using the quote thingy either.
OK libby. Why don't you explain which part of my posts on this topic has put someone down. After all, the only person who answered my question now claims not to be in category of people I was aiming the question at, so he's wasted everyone's time there.That's softus, if he's in the mood, he CAN pull people down
Before that, we had the following gems:Would any of those posters who are unable to both spell correctly and successfully use the forum quoting feature please explain what qualifies them to criticise the reasoning of a High Court judge?
high court judge ( mr.shi# 4 brains ) sir Andrew Collins....with dipsticks for judges we are all on a loser, sack the fool i say
So, who were you saying is putting people down, hm?each month there could be an award for "judge mental judge" of the month?
Daft as it sounds, but it might keeps these idiots on the front of the NOTW? or maybe just help keep a grip on reality?
You have nothing original to offer, and are a waste of space.Blimey. Keep your hair on.