Earthing them at both ends leads to some interesting circulating currents, it also serves to interconnect the HV steelwork earth with the LV earthing. Something that we routinely do but resist if we do not have control of all the connections
I'm tempted to suggest that one "can't have it both ways" - if no fault current can flow through those G/Y's, what purpose are they serving?If, as Westie suggests, the waveforms are earthed at just one end, no fault current would flow. Will see I guess....
if no fault current can flow through those G/Y's, what purpose are they serving?
Fair enough - but how does that translate into their 'purpose''. As I said, I'm pretty ignorant about anything non-domestic!As the cables are part of the DNO system they are ensuring compliance with ESQCRif no fault current can flow through those G/Y's, what purpose are they serving?
but how does that translate into their 'purpose''
Protective screens
13. (1) Underground cables and associated equipment which contain conductors not connected with earth shall be protected in accordance with paragraph (2).
(2) The protection referred to in paragraph (1) shall comprise—
(a)in respect of joints or terminations of a conductor in a low voltage system, some form of mechanical protection; and
(b)in respect of any other part of any conductor, an electrically continuous metallic screen connected with earth,
so placed as to ensure that, so far as is reasonably practicable, any tool or device likely to be used in the vicinity will make contact with that protection or screen before it can make contact with any conductors not connected with earth.
I fear we're going around in circles here Needless to say, that's what I assumed, but is it not then implicit that it can, in some circumstances, carry a 'full fault current'? For example, per your quote from ESQCR:By ensuring that the live cores are surrounded by an earthed metallic sheath.but how does that translate into their 'purpose''
If the cable were pentrated by a tool, which first came into contact with that sheath (whch is earthed via those very modest G/Ys) and then went on to also contact the line conductor within, would not a 'very large' fault current then flow (or try to flow) via the sheath and hence to earth through those 'G/Y tiddlers'?...so placed as to ensure that, so far as is reasonably practicable, any tool or device likely to be used in the vicinity will make contact with that protection or screen before it can make contact with any conductors not connected with earth.
would not a 'very large' fault current then flow (or try to flow) via the sheath and hence to earth through those 'G/Y tiddlers'?
The issues may be "well understood" by some, but they continue to be mysterious to me. Is is not possible to explain to me, in simple English (preferably short words ), what 'purpose' (other than 'satisfying ESCQR's requirement for an earthed {until the earth conductor melts} metallic sheath) these small G/Y cables serve, given that we seem to be aggreeing that they are far too small to carry the fault currents which theoretically could arise?Given the possible fault currents, the size of the bonding conductors would be huge and pretty much impossible to connect to the glands. The issues are well understood and if anyone were to damage one of these with a hand tool they would have circumvented a number of other safety barriers! Cables such as these are always installed in a very controlled environment where!would not a 'very large' fault current then flow (or try to flow) via the sheath and hence to earth through those 'G/Y tiddlers'?
Oh dear - on a par with bonding plastic pipes, then!But you've got it, compliance with ESQCR is all they serve!
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local