Lincsbodger said:
A coalition where the power is held by 59 MP's, and who can dictate to 306 MPs is hardly 'balanced'. Its a concentration of power into even less hands than before.
I have two things to say about that:
1) You're right.
2) It's the party system that's to blame.
The government, whoever they are, obviously want to govern - so they bully their party members into voting for whatever they want. That makes a mockery of parliamentary democracy.
The 'opposition', whoever they think they are, nearly always try to stop the government from doing whatever they want - so they also bully their party members into voting against the government. That's a double mockery. Do they even consider the possibility that the government might be right?
The assumption that the job of 'the opposition' is to oppose the government at every turn is, perhaps, a quirk of British politics and its overwhelming preoccupation with left-right, us-and-them, workers-and-toffs politics (about which I've said plenty elsewhere). This plays right into the hands of the minority parties and independents who are left holding the balance of power.
If you want real democracy, abolish the whip system and give every MP a free vote, anonymous if necessary.
My mother-in-law has a very simplistic solution. She wouldn't allow any minority parties at all!
It's an interesting idea but hardly democratic. I would rather see a lot more minority or non-party MPs in Parliament. It would force the government to think carefully about every policy. Now that's what I call democracy.