- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 42,858
- Reaction score
- 2,664
- Country
As with the bible, there are many interpretations of 7671.
I'd appreciate as many opinions as possible on this topic!!
Is no RCD on any install "not to current standards" or is it "at risk"?
I can see both arguments:
NTCS is where the install does not comply with latest edition (ie no RCD could be construed as NTCS)
AT RISK could be where the user is at risk (using eqipment outside the EZ) with no RCD to back them up.
Some people say you would note an install as NTCS if it had no RCD on equipment INSIDE the EZ, but AT RISK if stuff OUTSIDE the EZ had no RCD protection.
What say you??
I'd appreciate as many opinions as possible on this topic!!
Is no RCD on any install "not to current standards" or is it "at risk"?
I can see both arguments:
NTCS is where the install does not comply with latest edition (ie no RCD could be construed as NTCS)
AT RISK could be where the user is at risk (using eqipment outside the EZ) with no RCD to back them up.
Some people say you would note an install as NTCS if it had no RCD on equipment INSIDE the EZ, but AT RISK if stuff OUTSIDE the EZ had no RCD protection.
What say you??