Hi
In a pickle if anyone can help with advice
terraced property with a hip gable and a rear double extension which was with the original house.
converted hip to gable and built the rear dormer under PD fully finished when the planning officer turned up and stated that because the dormer is above the outrigger of the rear extension it is planning permission required.
quite confidently submitted the plans and got refused for the reason below:
1. By reason of its design, size and position the Hip to Gable Dormer conversion with chimney removal (as built and as so described in the application) adversely affects the appearance of the host dwelling house, the terrace in which it is sited and the street scene, and, would be detrimental to the character, local distinctiveness and sustainability of the area generally. This would be in conflict with policies Env6 of the Core Strategy, DM26 of the Development Management DPD and the Householder Design Guide of Hyndburn Borough Council.
No mention of the outrigger in the refusal etc
My understanding is this development comes under PD. Is this worth appealing to?
regards
In a pickle if anyone can help with advice
terraced property with a hip gable and a rear double extension which was with the original house.
converted hip to gable and built the rear dormer under PD fully finished when the planning officer turned up and stated that because the dormer is above the outrigger of the rear extension it is planning permission required.
quite confidently submitted the plans and got refused for the reason below:
1. By reason of its design, size and position the Hip to Gable Dormer conversion with chimney removal (as built and as so described in the application) adversely affects the appearance of the host dwelling house, the terrace in which it is sited and the street scene, and, would be detrimental to the character, local distinctiveness and sustainability of the area generally. This would be in conflict with policies Env6 of the Core Strategy, DM26 of the Development Management DPD and the Householder Design Guide of Hyndburn Borough Council.
No mention of the outrigger in the refusal etc
My understanding is this development comes under PD. Is this worth appealing to?
regards