Poor old Stephen....

[Notch7]

Well researched, not.

The law in Denmark is about face covering in public. It doesnt state with what. Its not a racist law.

Oh look, here is typicsl, smug, insulting post from Yafo.

Notice the key points missing:

1 why was the law introduced.

2 which people are mostly affected and therefore discriminated against.

 

[Yafo]

Oh look, here is typicsl, smug, insulting post from Yafo.

Notice the key points missing:

1 why was the law introduced.

2 which people are mostly affected and therefore discriminated against.

My point was factual, and to the point.

Please, prove me wrong. Failure to do so exposes yourself. Avoid another own goal ?

Try to stop attacking the person and concentrate on the message?

It is quite simple to prove either you or myself is wrong. I am willing to let you do that. Now, how smug is that ?

Do you understand Denmarks concerns, and some of its close neighbour, Sweden's issues ?

 

[Yafo]

I said unnerving, not intimidating. Not the same

If you are going to respond please make sure you understand the words you use. There are online dictionaries to help.

Ok, lets try again?

Does a group of people in hoodies and face coverings unnerve you, or intimidate you?

Do you think they might intimidate others ?

Or is it only certain people that affect you ?

Do you understand why I used the word intimidate, when you only used the word unnerved ?

 

[Notch7]

Do you understand why I used the word intimidate, when you only used the word unnerved ?

Yes.

You changed the word

To change the meaning

To argue a different point.

Its known as false argument or logical fallacy.

 

[Notch7]

My point was factual, and to the point

No.

You omitted to explain:

The reason for the ban.

Who the ban discriminates against.

 

[ellal]

Yes.

You changed the word

To change the meaning

To argue a different point.

Its known as false argument or logical fallacy.

Points well made.

Reflectively of course...

Because the contents of most (all?) of notchy's posts are utter b ullshit!

 

[Notch7]

Points well made.

Of course they are, I made them.

Whats your contribution.

 

[ellal]

Of course they, I made them.

Could you repeat that?

In English this time!

 

[Notch7]

Please, prove me wrong. Failure to do so exposes yourself. Avoid another own goal ?

Try to stop attacking the person and concentrate on the message?

Try running those 2 sentences through your mind.

Do you spot anything?

What would be the word that describes it

 

[ellal]

Try running those 2 sentences through your mind.

Do you spot anything?

What would be the word that describes it

Hmm...

Of course they, I made them.

Have you tried running that sentence of yours through your 'mind' yet?

PS. The word that comes to any sane mind is (as regards your posts) 'b ullshit'

That's my 'contribution' for you

PPS. Nice try on the edit btw

 

[Yafo]

No.

You omitted to explain:

The reason for the ban.

Who the ban discriminates against.

You omitted to prove who was right and who was wrong.

An oversight maybe ?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Could you repeat that?

In English this time!

Try running those 2 sentences through your mind.

Do you spot anything?

What would be the word that describes it

Hmm...


Have you tried running that sentence of yours through your 'mind' yet?

PS. The word that comes to any sane mind is (as regards your posts) 'b ullshit'

That's my 'contribution' for you

PPS. Nice try on the edit btw

Zero contribution to the discussion.

 

[Notch7]

The law in Denmark is about face covering in public. It doesnt state with what. Its not a racist law

Relates to:

Zero contribution to the discussion.

This person posts many insults that add zero contribution to any discussion.

 

[Notch7]

You omitted to prove who was right and who was wrong.

An oversight maybe ?

Why can you not answer:

Why was the ban introduced?

Who does it affect?

If you dont answer It must be assumed you cant provided an answer that supports your argument.

 

[Yafo]

Why can you not answer:

Why was the ban introduced?

Who does it affect?

If you dont answer It must be assumed you cant provided an answer that supports your argument.

3rd time.

Prove me wrong, can you ?

Or another own goal ?