Im replacing a damaged section of my lighting circuit in two bedrooms because there is no earth continuity.
At present there is L/N/E at the switch. I want to run a replacement section of cable from this switch to the light. I will then continue to the next switch and onto the final light fitting.
As the first light fitting is on the cable route to the second switch, I propose using 3C+E from the intitial switch to the fitting to supply a L/SWL/N/E. I will then use 2C+E to take L/N/E onto the next switch. Does this sound reasonable?
switch--->---L/SWL/N/E--->---fitting--->---L/N/E--->---switch--->---SWL/N/E--->---fitting
Or am I best to just use the conventional 2C+E method, instead taking another 2C+E on the route for the first fitting for my switched line?
At present there is L/N/E at the switch. I want to run a replacement section of cable from this switch to the light. I will then continue to the next switch and onto the final light fitting.
As the first light fitting is on the cable route to the second switch, I propose using 3C+E from the intitial switch to the fitting to supply a L/SWL/N/E. I will then use 2C+E to take L/N/E onto the next switch. Does this sound reasonable?
switch--->---L/SWL/N/E--->---fitting--->---L/N/E--->---switch--->---SWL/N/E--->---fitting
Or am I best to just use the conventional 2C+E method, instead taking another 2C+E on the route for the first fitting for my switched line?