you're one of those people who don't like to admit when they may have made an error aren't you?
no there is nothing inherantly dangerous with putting a smaller breaker on an existing circuit, HOWEVER, it then necessitates the need to notify the LABC or to employ the services of a registered electrician to do the work, adding a significant cost for soemthing that is not necesary..
the removal of the circuit from the bathroom is not notifiable, the addition of points to the circuit outside the bathroom is not notifiable, and as long as the connections for the equipment in the bathroom are outside of it ( as can be achieved by passing the flex through a flex outlet plate and connecting straight into the FCU on the oposite side of the wall ), then no notification is needed.
KAI stated that it MUST be changed, when in actuality there is NO such requirement to do so, which is the point that BAS and myself have been trying to get you to admit to..
a 30A 6mm² radial is perfectly acceptible for 2 FCU's..
no there is nothing inherantly dangerous with putting a smaller breaker on an existing circuit, HOWEVER, it then necessitates the need to notify the LABC or to employ the services of a registered electrician to do the work, adding a significant cost for soemthing that is not necesary..
the removal of the circuit from the bathroom is not notifiable, the addition of points to the circuit outside the bathroom is not notifiable, and as long as the connections for the equipment in the bathroom are outside of it ( as can be achieved by passing the flex through a flex outlet plate and connecting straight into the FCU on the oposite side of the wall ), then no notification is needed.
KAI stated that it MUST be changed, when in actuality there is NO such requirement to do so, which is the point that BAS and myself have been trying to get you to admit to..
a 30A 6mm² radial is perfectly acceptible for 2 FCU's..